Could you benefit from a more holistic risk management approach to business decisions?

Should ESG be killed off or better integrated into business decision-making processes?

Death of ESG? Long Live Holistic Risk Management: A Risk Management Expert’s Perspective

For over a decade, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing has dominated sustainable investing conversations. Proponents lauded its ability to integrate ethical considerations into investment decisions, while critics questioned its effectiveness and pointed out potential greenwashing. A more holistic approach to business decision is worth considering: Holistic Risk Management (HRM).

This article argues that while ESG has valuable elements, it falls short of a comprehensive risk management framework. We’ll explore the limitations of ESG and delve into the benefits of Holistic Risk Management. Through nine key differences, we’ll illustrate how HRM offers a more robust and future-proof approach to sustainable investing.

The Rise and Fall of ESG

ESG investing aimed to consider a company’s environmental impact (pollution, resource use), social responsibility (labour practices, diversity), and governance (transparency, board structure) alongside traditional financial metrics. This focus resonated with investors seeking alignment with their values and a potential hedge against future environmental and social risks.

However, ESG faced several challenges:

  • Lack of Standardisation: ESG ratings varied significantly between agencies, making comparisons difficult.
  • Data Transparency Issues: Companies often lacked consistent and verifiable ESG data, leading to accusations of greenwashing.
  • Focus on Short-Term Issues: ESG often prioritised easily measurable metrics over long-term, complex risks.

These limitations led some to question whether ESG truly delivered on its promise.

Enter Holistic Risk Management

Holistic Risk Management (HRM) offers a more comprehensive approach. It integrates ESG factors alongside a wider range of risks, both financial and non-financial. Here’s how HRM expands upon ESG:

1. Broader Risk Universe: HRM goes beyond ESG to encompass technological disruptions, geopolitical instability, and supply chain vulnerabilities.

2. Long-Term Focus: HRM takes a long-term view, considering future risks like climate change, resource depletion, and societal shifts.

3. Scenario Planning: HRM utilises scenario planning to assess a company’s preparedness for diverse future possibilities.

4. Stakeholder Engagement: HRM emphasises stakeholder engagement, understanding the needs of employees, customers, and communities.

5. Risk Mitigation Strategies: HRM goes beyond mere risk identification, focusing on proactive strategies to mitigate and manage risks.

6. Integration with Business Strategy: HRM seamlessly integrates risk management with a company’s overall business strategy.

7. Continuous Improvement: HRM promotes a culture of continuous improvement, with regular risk assessments and adjustments to strategies.

8. Data-Driven Approach: HRM leverages data analytics to identify, measure, and manage risks more effectively.

9. Scenario-Specific Action Plans: HRM creates specific action plans for different risk scenarios, ensuring a tailored response.

The Power of Holistic Risk Management

By adopting HRM, companies gain several advantages:

  • Enhanced Resilience: A comprehensive understanding of risks helps companies prepare for a wider range of challenges.
  • Improved Decision-Making: Integrating risk considerations into strategic decision-making fosters better resource allocation and long-term sustainability. By proactively managing risks, companies can avoid costly pitfalls and seize opportunities that might arise from changing circumstances.
  • Competitive Advantage: Strong risk management practices build investor confidence. Companies that demonstrate a commitment to HRM become more attractive to investors seeking sustainable and resilient investment opportunities. This can lead to a lower cost of capital and increased access to funding.

ESG: A Stepping Stone, Not a Destination

ESG remains a valuable tool for focusing on environmental, social, and governance issues. It has undoubtedly played a role in raising awareness of these critical factors and pushing companies to improve their practices. However, its limited scope and focus on readily quantifiable metrics fail to capture the complete risk landscape.

HRM: The Future of Sustainable Investing

Holistic Risk Management offers a more holistic approach, enabling companies to build long-term resilience and navigate an increasingly complex world. Regulatory bodies and investors are increasingly acknowledging the limitations of ESG and recognizing the value of HRM. For example, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has emphasized the importance of considering climate-related risks within risk management frameworks.

A Call to Action

The future of sustainable investing lies in embracing a holistic approach. Here’s what different stakeholders can do to move forward:

  • Risk Management Professionals: Advocate for the adoption of HRM within your organisations. Educate senior management on the benefits of HRM and its role in achieving long-term sustainability.
  • Investors: Encourage companies to move beyond ESG by prioritising HRM in your engagement strategies. Integrate questions about a company’s risk management framework and its approach to non-financial risks into your investment decision-making process.
  • Standard-Setting Bodies: Develop robust and standardised frameworks for HRM disclosure. This will allow investors to make informed comparisons between companies and hold them accountable for their risk management practices.

By working together, we can create a more sustainable and resilient investment landscape for the future. Holistic Risk Management offers a comprehensive approach that considers not just the financial bottom line, but also the environmental and social impacts of investment decisions. By embracing HRM, we can ensure a future where profitability and sustainability go hand-in-hand.

Get help to protect and grow your business with holistic risk management

Find out more

Subscribe for free business risk alerts and risk reviews

Enterprise Risk Management Magazine
Better Business Protection Faster Business Growth

Connect with us

Read more business risk management articles

Connect with us 

Global Markets News : China US and Europe Pot Kettle Black

Protecting one’s own market seems to lead to calling out others for your own crimes!

China’s Overcapacity and Deflation:

  • Issue: China possesses significant excess production capacity in certain industries like steel, aluminum, and solar panels. This overcapacity can lead to downward pressure on prices, potentially causing “deflationary exports” if Chinese companies sell goods below cost in international markets.
  • Arguments:
    • Proponents:
      • Overcapacity puts excessive pressure on global prices, hurting competitors and hindering fair trade.
      • Deflationary exports harm other economies, especially developing nations, undermining domestic industries.
      • China’s government subsidies exacerbate the problem, giving Chinese companies an unfair advantage.
    • Opponents:
      • Excess capacity isn’t unique to China; other countries face similar challenges in different sectors.
      • Global market forces, not just China, drive price fluctuations.
      • Accusations of “dumping” often lack concrete evidence, and Chinese prices might reflect lower production costs.

Impact on Western Markets:

  • Concerns: Deflationary Chinese exports could dampen inflation in Western economies, potentially hindering recovery from economic downturns.
  • Policies:
    • Inflation Reduction Act (US): Aims to boost domestic green energy production, potentially incentivising US companies over foreign competitors.
    • Green Deals (Europe): Similar focus on domestic green industries, raising concerns about protectionism.
  • Arguments:
    • Proponents: These policies incentivise domestic innovation and job creation, contributing to long-term economic stability.
    • Opponents: Such policies could restrict fair trade and hinder global efforts towards sustainability.

Comparison with Southeast Asia:

  • Southeast Asian nations: Facing challenges in exporting to Western markets due to factors like infrastructure limitations, trade barriers, and differing regulatory environments.
  • Arguments:
    • Proponents: Western policies favouring domestic green industries create an uneven playing field, disadvantageing Southeast Asian producers.
    • Opponents: Southeast Asian nations also need to focus on internal reforms to improve competitiveness and meet Western standards.

Key Considerations:

  • The issue is complex, with valid arguments on both sides.
  • Addressing overcapacity requires multifaceted solutions, including market-based reforms, industrial restructuring, and international cooperation.
  • Trade policies should balance legitimate concerns about unfair competition with the need for open and fair global markets.
  • Collaboration between all stakeholders, including governments, businesses, and civil society, is crucial for developing sustainable and equitable trade practices.

Additional Points:

  • The situation is dynamic, with ongoing efforts to address overcapacity and deflationary concerns in China.
  • The impact of Western policies like the Inflation Reduction Act and Green Deals is yet to be fully realised.
  • Continuous dialogue and policy adjustments are necessary to ensure a balanced and mutually beneficial global trade environment.

Get help to protect and grow your business

Find out more

Subscribe for free business risk alerts and risk reviews

Connect with us

Read more business risk management articles

Connect with us

The Deflationary Dance: China’s Overcapacity, Western Subsidies, and the Global Market Tug-of-War

China’s economic rise has been accompanied by a shadow: concerns about its industrial overcapacity and its potential to exacerbate global deflation through “dumping” cheap goods in international markets. This narrative often paints China as the sole culprit, ignoring similar practices and policies employed by Western nations, particularly the United States and Europe, that can also distort the global market and limit opportunities for developing economies. This article delves into the complex interplay of these factors, examining the arguments for and against China’s alleged deflationary threat and exploring the parallel policies in the West that create similar challenges for developing countries.

The Overcapacity Argument:

China’s rapid economic growth in recent decades has led to significant investment in various industries, particularly heavy industries like steel, shipbuilding, and aluminum. This investment boom resulted in substantial overcapacity, where production exceeds demand. Critics argue that excess production leads to price drops, as Chinese companies compete on price rather than quality, flooding global markets with unfairly cheap goods. This, they claim, can harm domestic industries in other countries, hindering their growth and competitiveness.

The “Dumping” Debate:

The accusation of “dumping” refers to selling goods below their cost of production in foreign markets. While China has faced anti-dumping investigations in the past, the evidence for systematic dumping is contested. Some argue that Chinese companies are simply more efficient and have lower production costs due to factors like economies of scale and government subsidies. Others point out that anti-dumping measures often protect inefficient domestic industries in developed countries, rather than promoting fair competition.

Beyond the Chinese Factor:

The narrative of China as the sole culprit conveniently overlooks similar practices and policies in the West. The United States, for example, has implemented the Inflation Reduction Act, which provides significant subsidies for domestic clean energy production. This policy, while aimed at reducing carbon emissions, also disadvantages foreign competitors, particularly those in developing countries with comparable clean energy technologies.

Similarly, the European Union’s Green Deal, which incentivises the transition to a more sustainable economy, can create barriers for developing economies that lack the resources to comply with its strict environmental regulations. These protectionist measures limit market access for developing countries, hindering their potential to export and participate in the global green economy.

The Global Market Tug-of-War:

The accusations against China’s overcapacity and “dumping” often ignore the broader context of globalised trade and competition. The global market is a complex web of interconnected economies, where each player seeks to maximise its own advantage. While China’s overcapacity may pose challenges, it is not the only factor contributing to global deflationary pressures.

Furthermore, the focus on China deflects attention from the need for global cooperation and coordinated efforts to address broader issues like overproduction, stagnant wages, and income inequality. These are systemic problems that require solutions beyond simply blaming individual countries or industries.

Moving Beyond the Blame Game:

Instead of engaging in a blame game, the international community should focus on finding constructive solutions that address the underlying issues of overproduction, market distortions, and unequal access to resources. This requires:

  • Transparency and accountability: All countries, including China, the United States, and the European Union, should be transparent about their trade practices and subsidies, and be held accountable for unfair trade practices.
  • Multilateral cooperation: International organisations like the World Trade Organisation (WTO) need to be strengthened to facilitate fair and open trade, while also addressing concerns about dumping and trade distortions.
  • Focus on sustainable development: Global efforts should focus on promoting sustainable development practices that create a level playing field for all countries, regardless of their stage of development. This includes investing in clean energy technologies, promoting innovation, and ensuring equitable access to resources.

Conclusion:

The issue of China’s overcapacity and its potential impact on global deflation is complex and multifaceted. While concerns about unfair trade practices are legitimate, it is crucial to avoid simplistic narratives that scapegoat individual countries. Instead, a more nuanced understanding is needed, acknowledging the role of similar policies in the West and focusing on finding cooperative solutions that benefit all players in the global market. Only through multilateral cooperation and a commitment to sustainable development can we ensure a level playing field for all and create a more prosperous and equitable future for the global economy.

Operational Risks In 2024

Improve your business internal processes people and systems

Operational Risks in 2024: A Navigational Guide for Businesses and Risk Managers

As the world hurtles towards 2024, the operational landscape for businesses continues to evolve at a breakneck pace. Technological advancements, geopolitical shifts, and ever-changing consumer demands necessitate constant adaptation and vigilance. Amidst this dynamic environment, operational risks – the potential for loss arising from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, or systems – emerge as a critical concern for organisations of all sizes.

This article delves into the realm of operational risks in 2024, offering a comprehensive guide for businesses and risk managers alike. We’ll explore the key trends shaping the operational risk landscape, emerging threats to watch out for, and effective strategies for mitigating and managing these risks.

Navigating the 2024 Operational Risk Landscape:

1. Technological Evolution: A Double-Edged Sword:

Technology plays a pivotal role in modern business operations, streamlining processes and boosting efficiency. However, technological advancements also introduce new operational risks. The rapid adoption of cloud computing, for instance, while offering scalability and cost-effectiveness, raises concerns about data security and system vulnerabilities. Likewise, the burgeoning Internet of Things (IoT) exposes organisations to potential cyberattacks and privacy breaches through interconnected devices. Operational risk managers must stay abreast of the latest technological developments and implement robust security measures to mitigate these risks.

2. Geopolitical Turmoil: A Looming Threat:

The global political climate remains fragile, with ongoing conflicts and trade tensions adding to the uncertainty. These factors can disrupt supply chains, impact market access, and trigger financial instability. Businesses operating in high-risk regions are particularly vulnerable to geopolitical instability. Operational risk managers must carefully assess the geopolitical landscape and develop contingency plans to navigate potential disruptions.

3. Climate Change: A Pressing Reality:

Climate change is no longer a distant threat but a tangible reality impacting businesses worldwide. From extreme weather events to rising sea levels, the changing climate poses operational risks across various sectors. For example, natural disasters can damage infrastructure, disrupt operations, and lead to financial losses. Operational risk managers must incorporate climate change considerations into their risk assessments and implement measures to build resilience.

4. Human Error: A Persistent Challenge:

Despite technological advancements, human error remains a significant source of operational risk. Mistakes made by employees, from data entry errors to process lapses, can have far-reaching consequences. Effective training programmes, clear communication channels, and robust internal controls are crucial to minimize human error and mitigate associated risks.

5. Emerging Technologies: Potential for Disruption:

Emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain hold immense promise for businesses. However, their unfamiliarity and rapid development also introduce uncertainties. For example, AI algorithms can perpetuate biases, while blockchain-based systems can be vulnerable to cyberattacks. Operational risk managers must carefully evaluate the risks and opportunities associated with emerging technologies before implementation.

Operational Risk Management Strategies for 2024:

1. Proactive Risk Identification:

Effective risk management begins with proactive identification. Operational risk managers should employ comprehensive risk assessment methodologies to identify potential threats across all business functions. This includes regularly reviewing processes, systems, and external factors to anticipate and prioritise emerging risks.

2. Robust Controls and Measures:

Once risks are identified, robust controls and measures must be implemented to mitigate their impact. This might involve developing contingency plans for disruptions, implementing security protocols to protect data, and establishing clear lines of communication to manage crises effectively.

3. Continuous Monitoring and Improvement:

The risk landscape is constantly evolving, necessitating continuous monitoring and improvement of risk management practices. Operational risk managers should regularly review and update risk assessments, test controls, and adapt their strategies as needed to ensure ongoing effectiveness.

4. Communication and Collaboration:

Effective risk management requires open communication and collaboration across all levels of the organisation. Risk managers should share risk assessments and mitigation strategies with relevant stakeholders, and encourage employees to report potential issues promptly. Fostering a culture of risk awareness is crucial for proactive risk management.

5. Embrace Technology:

Technology can be a valuable tool for managing operational risks. Utilising risk management software, data analytics tools, and artificial intelligence-powered solutions can streamline risk assessments, enhance monitoring, and predict potential issues. Operational risk managers should embrace technology to augment their risk management capabilities.

The Role of Operational Risk Managers in 2024:

In today’s dynamic and complex business environment, the role of operational risk managers is more critical than ever. They are not merely risk mitigators but strategic partners, guiding organisations towards resilience and long-term success.

Operational Risk Managers: Orchestrating Resilience in 2024

Operational risk managers in 2024 must wear several hats. They are visionaries: scanning the horizon for emerging threats and anticipating future risks. They are analysts: meticulously assessing potential impacts and crafting nuanced mitigation strategies. They are communicators: building bridges across departments and fostering a culture of risk awareness. And they are orchestrators: harmonising technology, processes, and people to build organisational resilience.

Skillset for Success:

To fulfill these multifaceted roles, operational risk managers require a unique blend of skills:

  • Technical expertise: Understanding core operational processes,technology vulnerabilities, and risk management methodologies.
  • Analytical prowess: Deep diving into data, identifying patterns, and predicting potential risk scenarios.
  • Communication mastery: Clearly conveying risks to stakeholders,tailoring messages to different audiences, and engaging in persuasive advocacy.
  • Leadership talent: Fostering a collaborative risk culture, inspiring ownership, and empowering teams to embrace risk management practices.
  • Adaptability and agility: Navigating the ever-changing risk landscape,learning from challenges, and pivoting strategies as needed.

Empowering Operational Risk Managers:

Organisations must recognise the vital role of operational risk managers and empower them to succeed. This includes:

Conclusion:

The future of business hangs in the delicate balance of risk and resilience. In 2024, operational risk managers hold the key to unlocking this balance. By proactively identifying threats, implementing robust mitigation strategies, and fostering a culture of risk awareness, they can steer organisations through volatile environments and pave the way for sustainable success.

Get help to protect and grow your business

Find Out More

Subscribe for free business risk alerts, reports and reviews

Contact Us

Read more business risk management articles

Contact Us

Pros and Cons Of Economic Migration into UK and USA

Trying to take wokeness out of key business risk management threats and opportunities

Can Economic Migrants Be the Recessionary Storm’s Lifeline? A 2024 Outlook for UK and USA

As storm clouds gather on the economic horizon, recessionary whispers turn into anxious roars in both the UK and the USA. In this tumultuous climate, a fascinating question emerges: Could economic migrants potentially act as a life raft, mitigating the damage of a potential recession in 2024?

As an expert economic analyst ( Keith Lewis ), I delve into this intricate issue, dissecting the potential role of economic migration in weathering the coming economic storm in these two major economies.

Buoying the Economy in Rough Seas:

Several arguments propose that economic migrants can serve as a buffer against recessionary forces:

  • Labour force resilience: With skilled and willing newcomers filling critical labour gaps, particularly in sectors facing shortages, economic migrants can bolster productivity and output. This can stabilise the economy and counteract downward trends, as evidenced by the contribution of migrant workers to sectors like UK healthcare and US agriculture.
  • Demand lifeline: By injecting fresh purchasing power into the economy, migrants can stimulate businesses and create jobs. This can boost aggregate demand, a crucial driver of economic recovery, as research by the OECD suggests with increased migration boosting GDP growth in several European countries.
  • Innovation anchor: Migrants often bring a wealth of entrepreneurial spirit and skills, driving business creation and innovation. This can foster economic growth and generate employment opportunities, potentially alleviating recessionary pressures, as demonstrated by the significant role of immigrants in US startup ecosystems.
  • Fiscal stability: As migrant workers contribute through income taxes and payroll deductions, they can bolster government revenue streams. This can provide crucial budgetary resources for social programs and infrastructure investments, helping governments navigate and mitigate the impact of a recession, as analyses in the UK suggest regarding the positive fiscal contribution of immigration.

However, navigating these turbulent waters necessitates caution:

  • Wage suppression: An influx of migrant workers can put downward pressure on wages,particularly for low-skilled jobs.This can dampen consumer spending and exacerbate inequalities, hindering overall economic growth, as studies in the US have shown in specific sectors.
  • Social tensions: Large-scale migration can strain social services and resources, potentially leading to public anxieties and fueling xenophobia.This can make it politically challenging to maintain open borders, even with potential economic benefits, as witnessed in the current political climates of both the UK and the USA.
  • Integration hurdles: Successful integration of migrants into the workforce and society is crucial for maximising their economic contribution. Language barriers, cultural differences, and lack of recognition of foreign qualifications can hinder integration, limiting the positive economic impact of migration. Robust policies promoting skill recognition and language training are essential to overcome these hurdles.

Navigating the Choppy Waters of 2024:

Assessing the evidence requires acknowledging the complexities of this issue. Studies on the direct link between economic migration and recessionary tendencies remain inconclusive, with varying results depending on factors like the skillsets of migrants, existing labour market conditions, and government policies. A tailored approach, considering specific national contexts, is crucial.

Charting the Course in 2024 and Beyond:

To leverage the potential benefits of economic migration while mitigating potential drawbacks in 2024 and beyond, both the UK and the USA can consider the following:

  • Skill-based migration strategies: Prioritising the entry of migrants with skills in high demand to address labour shortages and boost productivity, ensuring a win-win for both businesses and the economy.
  • Effective integration programs: Investing in language training, skills recognition, and cultural orientation programs can facilitate smooth integration, maximising the positive economic contribution of migrants and fostering social cohesion.
  • Robust social safety nets: Ensuring adequate social services and resources for both native and migrant populations can mitigate potential tensions and prevent economic hardship during a recession.
  • Data-driven policymaking: Continuously monitoring and analysing the impacts of migration policies on both the economy and social fabric is crucial for evidence-based policy adjustments and ensuring responsible management of migration in the face of economic challenges.

Conclusion:

While economic migrants cannot entirely prevent a recession, they can potentially play a crucial role in minimising its impact and expediting economic recovery. However, it is essential to acknowledge the complexities and potential challenges associated with migration. Openness to talent, coupled with responsible management, integration efforts, and data-driven policymaking, can harness the potential of economic migration to navigate the choppy waters of 2024 and build resilient economies for the future. Remember, weathering economic storms requires a balanced approach, embracing the potential of diverse resources while ensuring responsible and inclusive practices.

Subscribe to more business risk management articles videos and risk reviews

Contact Us

Grow your business faster and protect it from economic recession

Contact Us

Develop your career or fill painful skills gaps faster and cheaper

Contact Us

 .

Risk Based Approach To Business Success

Manage your business better with more confidence

Risk based approach in business management. The benefits of risk-based approach include a better understanding of what is really important for your business success. Assess and manage your business risks better.

  • Identify the key risks for your business to ensure you know what you need to focus your mind and money on.
  • Take action to maximise your ability to maintain and boost your business performance.
  • Monitor your progress towards your business objectives in a systematic way to minimise gaps and protect against changing risk exposure.
  • Make best use of your limited assets and resources to avoid wasted money and effort.
  • Develop a flexible business management strategy to better manage the dynamic world of business.

Think more systematically about your business development.

How do you use risk based approach in business

Find out more about free business risk management newsletters and Risk Alerts for your country and industry. Engage with like-minded business leaders to grow your business faster with less uncertainty. Develop your business risk management skills and knowledge with online risk management training courses and workshops.

Risk-Based Approach To Business Success