Hidden History & Business Risk: Is Your Strategy Prepared for a 1914-Style Global Reset?

Is history repeating itself? Our deep-dive analysis of Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War by Docherty and Macgregor reveals the hidden geopolitical risks facing modern corporations. Learn how “Secret Elite” agendas and systemic collusion can trigger global market collapses, and discover six critical reasons why today’s business leaders must shift from reactive to proactive resilience. Don’t let your supply chain be the next casualty of a “Black Swan” event—prepare your business for the next Great Reset.

In Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War, Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor argue that WWI wasn’t a series of diplomatic blunders, but a calculated destruction of Germany orchestrated by a secret “Elite” in London.

From a Business Risk Management (BRM) perspective, this narrative serves as a masterclass in identifying “Black Swan” events that are actually “Grey Rhinos”—highly probable, high-impact threats that are often ignored until it’s too late.


Business Risk Analysis: The “Hidden History” Lens

If we treat the geopolitical landscape of 1914 as a market, the book highlights several critical risk categories:

  • Systemic Corruption & Collusion: The authors suggest that a small group (the “Secret Elite”) manipulated national policy for long-term strategic gain. For a business, this represents Counterparty Risk—the danger that the “rules of the game” are being written by competitors or regulators behind closed doors.

  • Information Asymmetry: The book claims the public was fed a narrative of “Belgian neutrality” to mask deeper agendas. In business, relying on mainstream data or “consensus” can lead to a failure in Strategic Forecasting.

  • Geopolitical Contagion: The transition from a localised Balkan conflict to a global catastrophe illustrates how quickly Supply Chain Disruption and Market Volatility can scale when hidden alliances are triggered.


6 Reasons Why History Could Repeat Itself Soon

Current global dynamics mirror the pre-1914 era in several unsettling ways:

  1. Thucydides’ Trap: Just as the British Empire feared a rising Germany, the current tension between the U.S. and China creates a structural risk where a dominant power feels forced to suppress a challenger.

  2. Echo Chambers & Propaganda: The “Secret Elite” used the press to whip up anti-German sentiment. Today, AI-driven algorithms and social media echo chambers can radicalise populations and manufacture consent for conflict faster than ever.

  3. Complex Alliance Webs: Much like the secret treaties of 1914, modern mutual defence pacts and “informal” military partnerships mean a spark in a small region (like the South China Sea or Eastern Europe) could force a global decoupling.

  4. Resource Scarcity & Energy Shifts: The 1914 era was about the shift from coal to oil and control of the Berlin-Baghdad railway. Today, the race for rare earth minerals and semiconductor dominance creates similar “must-win” flashpoints.

  5. Economic Financialisation: The book argues high-finance interests drove the war. Today’s global economy is heavily leveraged; a massive debt crisis could tempt leaders to use “war footing” as a distraction or a way to reset the financial system.

  6. Technological Arrogance: In 1914, leaders believed the war would be “over by Christmas” due to superior tech. Today, the belief that Cyber Warfare or Precision Strikes will lead to “short, clean” conflicts often ignores the reality of unpredictable escalation.


How Business Leaders Can Protect Their Interests

To avoid being collateral damage in a “Hidden History” style escalation, leaders should move from reactive to proactive resilience:

The Lesson: History suggests that the greatest risks aren’t the ones we see on the news, but the ones being discussed in private rooms by those who benefit from the chaos.

Executive Scenario Planning Template Example

Focus: Geopolitical Resilience & Strategic Redundancy

This template is designed to help executive teams move past “business as usual” and confront the non-linear risks highlighted by Docherty and Macgregor. It focuses on the “Hidden History” premise: that the biggest threats are often pre-planned or systemic, rather than accidental.

1. The “Hidden Ally” Audit

In 1914, secret agreements forced nations into a war they hadn’t publicly debated. Businesses often have similar “hidden” dependencies.

  • Mapping Dependencies: List your Top 5 critical vendors. Do they share a single point of failure (e.g., all rely on the same shipping lane, the same energy grid, or the same political regime)?

  • The “What If” Trigger: If Country X imposes an immediate export ban on a key component tomorrow, how many days can your operations survive?

  • Action: Identify one “Non-Aligned” alternative supplier for every critical dependency.

2. Narrative & Information Risk Analysis

The “Secret Elite” used media to shape public perception. In a modern crisis, your brand could be caught in the crossfire of state-sponsored disinformation.

3. Scenario Matrix: Four Degrees of Disruption

Use this table to evaluate your readiness for different levels of escalation:

Disruption Level Scenario Example Business Impact Mitigation Priority
Level 1: Friction Increased tariffs / Trade war Margin compression Pricing agility & tax optimization
Level 2: Segregation Sanctions / Regional internet split Loss of specific market access Ring-fencing regional assets
Level 3: Hard Decoupling Complete trade embargoes Supply chain collapse Localization of manufacturing
Level 4: Kinetic Conflict Global War / Infrastructure hit Total operational halt Physical security & cash liquidity

4. Financial “War Chest” Strategy

The book argues that those with liquid assets and prior knowledge thrived during the transition to war.

  • Liquidity Stress Test: In a scenario where credit markets freeze (similar to 1914 or 2008), do you have enough non-digital or highly liquid reserves to cover 6 months of payroll?

  • Currency Diversification: Are your cash reserves held in a single currency? Consider a “Geopolitical Basket” (e.g., USD, CHF, Gold, or decentralised assets) to hedge against a systemic collapse of one fiat system.


Next Steps for the Leadership Team:

  1. Assign a “Red Team”: Appoint three team members to play “Devil’s Advocate” for every major strategic expansion. Their job is to find the “Hidden History” reason why the expansion will fail.

  2. Quarterly Geopolitical Brief: Move beyond standard economic reports. Look at defence spending trends and undersea cable/satellite investments to see where the “Secret Elites” of today are placing their bets.

To keep this lean and focused, here is a “Red Team” questionnaire designed to puncture optimism bias and reveal the hidden systemic risks in your 5-year plan.

These questions are framed to uncover the “Secret Elite” style risks—those factors that aren’t on a standard balance sheet but can sink a company during a geopolitical shift.

Phase 1: The Dependency & “Invisible Hand” Test

  • The Single-Point-of-Failure Audit: If a “black swan” event permanently closed the borders of your primary manufacturing or service hub tomorrow, does the business have a “Plan B” that doesn’t rely on that same geographic region?

  • The Shadow Influence Check: Are our key strategic partners or investors also heavily invested in our direct competitors or in nations with conflicting interests? Who benefits if our current 5-year plan fails?

  • The Subsidy/Regulation Trap: Is our projected growth dependent on current government subsidies or “friendly” regulations? If a political shift occurred and those were stripped away to fund a “war footing” economy, is the project still viable?

Phase 2: Information & Infrastructure Resilience

  • The Narrative Pivot: If our brand becomes politically “toxic” in a major market due to circumstances entirely outside our control (e.g., a national conflict), can we “ring-fence” that region and continue operating elsewhere, or is our identity too centralised?

  • The Analog Fail-Safe: If a sophisticated cyber-offensive took down the primary cloud service providers we use for 30 days, do we have any “manual” or localised way to fulfill orders or maintain core operations?

  • The “Secret” Intelligence Gap: Are we making decisions based on “consensus data” (mainstream media/economic reports) that everyone else sees, or do we have “boots on the ground” insights into the physical movement of goods and local political sentiment?

Phase 3: Financial & Strategic Exit Ramps

  • The Liquidity Lock: If the global banking system experienced a “bank holiday” or a freeze on international transfers (similar to the start of WWI), do we have the local currency or physical assets to keep our global staff paid for 90 days?

  • The Sunk Cost Trap: At what specific “tripwire” (e.g., a specific sanction or a specific percentage of inflation) do we agree to abandon a major project rather than “doubling down” out of pride or previous investment?

  • The Leadership Vacuum: If our executive team were unable to communicate for 72 hours due to a total communications blackout, does the next layer of management have the clear authority and “commander’s intent” to make high-stakes decisions?


How to use this:

Distribute these questions to your leadership team. Have each member answer them anonymously first. You will often find that your “boots on the ground” staff (Ops, Supply Chain) see the “Hidden History” risks much more clearly than the C-suite.

#BusinessRisk #GeopoliticalRisk #HiddenHistoryWW1 #BusinessRiskTV #RiskManagement

Get help to protect and grow your business faster through any business environment you have to operate within

Learn more about growing your business through uncertain world

Subscribe for free business risk management ideas risk reviews and cost reduction tips

Connect with us for free business risk management tips

Read more business risk management articles and view videos for free

Connect with us for free alerts to new business risk management articles and videos 

Hidden History & Business Risk: Is Your Strategy Prepared for a 1914-Style Global Reset?

Navigating Geopolitical Storms: Business Risk Analysis Post-Davos 2026

The 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos revealed a stark rupture in transatlantic relations, creating immediate and long-term risks for global businesses. This analysis breaks down the key takeaways for leaders and provides six actionable steps to protect and grow your business in an era of heightened geopolitical confrontation.

The Davos Divide and the New Risk Landscape

The 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos will be remembered not for its solutions, but for its stark exposures. The confrontation between European leaders and the American administration laid bare a deep fracture in the Western alliance, moving geopolitical tensions from the background to the forefront of executive decision-making. President Trump’s antagonistic speech, which included grievances against European allies, questioning of NATO commitments, and a relentless focus on acquiring Greenland, signalled a profound shift toward a world where confrontation is replacing collaboration.

For business leaders, this is not merely political theatre. It is a direct and material risk. The WEF’s own Global Risks Report 2026 identifies “geoeconomic confrontation” as the top risk most likely to trigger a global crisis this year, followed by state-based armed conflict. This environment demands a new playbook for risk management—one that is proactive, integrated, and resilient. The old model of globalisation, with its deeply integrated supply chains and stable multilateral rules, is under severe pressure. As one analysis notes, companies are now forced to consider parallel supply chains and navigate a world where data, trade, and investment are increasingly weaponised.

This post provides a clear-eyed analysis of the key business risks emerging from Davos and outlines six practical, immediate steps to turn this uncertainty into a strategic advantage.

Key Risk Exposures for Businesses After Davos 2026

The events at Davos crystallised several interconnected risk categories that threaten business operations, strategy, and financial performance.

1. Accelerated Geoeconomic Fragmentation & Supply Chain Rupture

The core takeaway is the active unravelling of decades of economic integration. The U.S. administration’s focus on unilateral deals and transactional relationships, as seen with the “framework” for Greenland, undermines the predictable, rules-based system. For businesses, this translates directly into severe supply chain vulnerability. As noted in research from Wharton, companies are being forced to build duplicate, resilient supply chains—a China-centric one and a non-China-centric one—which creates enormous cost and redundancy. This fragmentation is no longer a future threat; it is a present-day operational and financial challenge.

2. Policy Volatility and Regulatory Divergence

Davos highlighted a growing chasm in core policy areas, especially climate and energy. While European leaders and CEOs like Allianz’s Oliver Bäte passionately defended the green transition, calling backlash “bulls—,” the U.S. administration championed fossil fuels and mocked renewable energy policies. This divergence creates a nightmare of regulatory compliance. Companies operating transatlantically face conflicting mandates, as seen historically with EU laws forcing tech changes (like the USB-C port mandate) and strict data rules like GDPR. The risk is being caught in a regulatory crossfire, incurring massive costs to comply with opposing standards in different markets.

3. The Weaponisation of Data and Digital Platforms

A novel and under appreciated risk highlighted in broader analyses is the politicisation of data. Governments increasingly demand control over data of multinational companies within their borders, using it as a tool for political leverage. This was evident in past pressures on tech companies during geopolitical tensions. In a world of “multipolarity without multilateralism,” your customer data, operational data, and intellectual property are no longer just corporate assets—they are geopolitical pawns. This creates immense risks for data security, privacy compliance, and brand reputation.

4. Erosion of the Social License to Operate

Businesses are increasingly “stuck in the middle” of societal and political polarisation. The “streets versus elites” narrative is rising, and companies face pressure to take stands on divisive issues while also demonstrating fealty to national governments. The WEF report identifies misinformation and disinformation as the #2 global risk over the next two years, which can rapidly inflame public sentiment against a brand. Navigating these waters without a clear strategy exposes companies to boycotts, talent attrition, and lasting reputational damage.

Six Practical Risk Management Steps for Business Leaders

In this age of competition, a reactive, wait-and-watch approach is a direct threat to survival. Here is your six-step action plan to build resilience and discover opportunity.

Step 1: Conduct a Geopolitical Stress Test on Your Core Operations

Immediately move beyond traditional SWOT analysis. Launch a cross-functional task force to conduct a dedicated geopolitical stress test. This involves mapping your entire value chain—from critical material sourcing and Tier-N suppliers to key logistics corridors and primary sales markets—against a map of escalating geopolitical flashpoints. Quantify the impact of potential disruptions. For example, what is the financial exposure if a specific trade corridor is tariffed or closed? What alternative suppliers exist outside of geopolitical hotspots? The goal is to move from qualitative worry to quantitative preparedness.

Step 2: Build a Dynamic Early Warning System

You cannot manage what you do not see. Relying on quarterly risk reports is obsolete. Implement an AI-powered early warning system that monitors real-time signals. This system should track not just news, but proposed legislation, social media sentiment, and trade policy adjustments in all your operational regions. Use technology to set alerts for specific keywords related to your industry, as some firms track terms like “oil drilling” in legislative texts. This transforms scattered data into actionable intelligence, giving you a crucial time advantage to respond.

Step 3: Formalise a “Political Risk War Room” and Governance

Political risk can no longer be siloed in government affairs. Follow the advice of experts and establish a cross-functional geostrategic committee that reports directly to the C-suite and board. This committee should include leaders from supply chain, finance, legal, communications, and strategy. Its mandate is to meet regularly, review early-warning intelligence, assess potential financial impacts, and authorise pre-planned contingency actions. This governance structure ensures rapid, coordinated decision-making when a crisis emerges.

Step 4: Develop “Plug-and-Play” Contingency Plans for Key Scenarios

For your top three geopolitical risk scenarios (e.g., “Sudden Tariffs on Key Import,” “Embargo on Technology Exports to Market X,” “Forced Local Data Storage Mandate”), develop pre-approved contingency playbooks. These should outline clear trigger points, decision authorities, and specific actions. For instance, a playbook for new tariffs might include immediate steps to activate alternative shipping routes, pre-negotiated contracts with alternative suppliers, and a communications template for customers. This shifts the response from panic to execution.

Step 5: Diversify Stakeholder Capital and Government Relationships

In a fragmented world, relationships are a critical risk mitigation asset. Proactively diversify your stakeholder engagement beyond traditional channels. Build relationships with policymakers, regulators, and community leaders in all your key markets before a crisis hits. Furthermore, explore financial resilience tools like political risk insurance to protect physical assets and investments in unstable regions. Also, reassess your capital structure and banking relationships to ensure you have access to liquidity from diverse sources if financial markets seize up due to geopolitical shock.

Step 6: Embed Strategic Agility into Your Business Model

Ultimately, the greatest risk is the status quo. Use this moment of clarity to build inherent agility into your business model. This includes:

  • Product Design: Develop products with modular designs that can be easily adapted to different regulatory or standards environments (e.g., different power specs, data protocols).
  • Manufacturing: Invest in flexible, smaller-scale production facilities (like “micro-factories”) that can be relocated or repurposed faster than monolithic plants.
  • Talent Strategy: Cultivate a distributed leadership bench with deep regional expertise, empowering local teams to make rapid decisions in response to local disruptions.

Conclusion: From Risk to Resilient Growth

The message from Davos 2026 is unambiguous: the business environment has fundamentally shifted. The greatest danger now is inaction—the risk of assuming the old rules still apply. However, within this volatility lies significant opportunity. Companies that proactively manage these geopolitical risks will not only protect their existing value but will gain a powerful competitive edge. They will be the ones able to seize market share as slower competitors falter, negotiate from a position of strength with governments, and attract investment as havens of stability.

The time for vague concern is over. The time for deliberate, structured action is now. Begin your geopolitical stress test this week.

Protect and grow your business faster with BusinessRiskTV

Find out more about growing your business faster with less uncertainty impacting your business objectives 

Subscribe for free business risk management ideas risk reviews and cost reduction tips

Connect with us for free business risk management tips

Read more free business risk management articles and view videos for free

Connect with us for free alerts to new business risk management articles and videos

Navigating Geopolitical Storms: Business Risk Analysis Post-Davos 2026

BRICS Gold-Backed Unit: 6 Business Risk Management Strategies to Protect Profit from De-Dollarisation

The BRICS group’s pilot launch of the “Unit,” a gold-backed digital trade instrument, signals a major shift away from the US Dollar. For international businesses, this de-dollarisation trend creates significant FX and market access risks. Discover the 6 essential business risk management actions—from diversifying payment rails and currency hedging to supply chain re-evaluation—that business leaders must implement now to protect and grow their business in a rapidly changing, multipolar global financial landscape.

The launch of the BRICS “Unit” gold-backed digital trade instrument, even in its pilot phase, signals a significant, long-term shift toward de-dollarisation and the emergence of a multipolar financial system. This development primarily creates currency volatility risk, geopolitical risk, and market access risk for international businesses.


Business Risk Management Actions For BRICS Gold Backed Currency

Business leaders must take proactive steps to protect profit margins and capitalise on new trade opportunities that bypass the traditional dollar-centric financial architecture.

1. Diversify Currency Exposure and Payment Rails

  • Action: Systematically audit all accounts receivable and accounts payable to quantify exposure to the US Dollar (USD) versus BRICS currencies (BRL, CNY, INR, RUB, ZAR) and the new “Unit” if it becomes readily available for international trade.

  • Mitigation: Establish banking relationships or payment channels that can facilitate settlements in multiple currencies, including BRICS members’ local currencies and potentially the Unit. This reduces reliance on USD-centric payment systems like SWIFT.

2. Adopt Dynamic Currency Hedging Strategies

  • Action: Move beyond simple forward contracts and explore more flexible hedging instruments like currency options to protect margins while retaining the ability to benefit from favourable exchange rate movements.

  • Mitigation: Implement a formal, actively monitored Foreign Exchange (FX) risk management policy. Consider utilising natural hedging by matching revenues and expenses in the same currency to reduce net exposure (e.g., sourcing materials in Chinese Yuan if sales are also made in Yuan).

3. Revise Trade and Procurement Strategies

  • Action: Evaluate the cost-competitiveness of suppliers and buyers within BRICS and Global South nations who may preferentially adopt the Unit for trade settlement, benefiting from lower transaction costs.

  • Mitigation: Proactively renegotiate existing contracts to include multi-currency settlement clauses or specify pricing in a currency basket that aligns with the Unit’s composition (gold + BRICS currencies) to stabilise invoice values against pure fiat currency volatility.

4. Geographic and Supply Chain Re-evaluation

  • Action: Map the geographic distribution of your supply chain and customer base to identify regions most likely to adopt the “Unit” (i.e., BRICS nations, Global South/Africa).

  • Mitigation: Increase market intelligence focus on these regions. Where feasible, localise manufacturing or sourcing in key BRICS countries to operate and transact more easily within their emerging financial ecosystem and reduce cross-currency friction.

5. Monitor Political and Regulatory Developments

  • Action: Designate a senior executive or external consultant to track the official adoption status, technical specifications, and regulatory compliance requirements of the BRICS Unit in relevant markets.

  • Mitigation: Develop contingency plans for scenarios where major trading partners impose tariffs or sanctions in response to de-dollarisation efforts, such as the potential for US tariff actions.

6. Model Financial Impact Scenarios

  • Action: Incorporate high-impact, low-probability events—such as a rapid 10-20% USD devaluation or the swift, widespread adoption of the Unit across key commodity markets—into financial forecasting and budgeting.

  • Mitigation: Use the scenario models to determine acceptable levels of currency volatility for profit margins and establish clear trigger points for enacting the new, diversified hedging and payment strategies.

Get help to protect and grow your business faster with BusinessRiskTV

Find out more about growing your business faster with less uncertainty with BusinessRiskTV 

Subscribe for free business risk management ideas risk reviews and cost reduction solutions

Connect with us for free business risk management tips

Read more business risk management articles and view videos for free

Connect with us for free alerts to new business risk management articles and videos

BRICS Gold-Backed Unit: 6 Business Risk Management Strategies to Protect Profit from De-Dollarisation