Tag: Banking Industry Outlook UK

Banking Industry Outlook With BusinessRiskTV

How much unrealised losses do banks have?

Banks unrealised losses

12 Reasons Why Business Leaders Should Be Worried About Banking Industry Bond Losses

A U.S. Banking and Economy Expert’s Perspective

As a U.S. banking and economy expert, I’m deeply concerned about the potential materialisation of significant bond losses within the banking industry. The recent news of Bank of America experiencing a staggering $109 billion loss in its bond portfolio during the first quarter of 2024 serves as a stark warning sign. This isn’t an isolated incident, and business leaders across America and the globe would be wise to heed this call.

Here are 12 key reasons why banking industry bond losses should be a major concern for business leaders:

1. A Domino Effect: Banks are interconnected. Losses at one institution can trigger a chain reaction, causing instability and potential failure within others. This could disrupt lending, credit markets, and overall economic activity.

2. Tightened Lending: If banks experience significant losses, they may become more cautious in their lending practices. This could restrict access to capital for businesses, hindering growth and investment.

3. Market Contagion: Banking industry pain can quickly spread to other sectors. Stock markets could plummet, eroding investor confidence and impacting business valuations.

4. Global Financial Crisis Echoes: The 2008 financial crisis serves as a stark reminder of how interconnected financial institutions are. A banking collapse could trigger a similar global crisis with devastating consequences.

5. Interest Rate Uncertainty: While the Federal Reserve has signalled no change interest rates could call in 2024, U.S. inflation had risen for the last 5 months, the geopolitical world indicates rising fuel placing more pressure on price rises and unemployment and wages indicate a need for higher for longer interest rates. Rising rates in the future could further exacerbate banking industry bond losses yet to fully be realised. They are already there they just have not been recognised fully.

6. Corporate Bond Exposure: Many businesses rely on corporate bonds for financing. If these bonds lose value due to bank selling or defaults, it could strain corporate finances and lead to bankruptcies.

7. Consumer Confidence Decline: Public trust in the banking system is crucial for a healthy economy. Widespread news of bank losses could erode consumer confidence, leading to decreased spending and investment. It could also spark a run on banking deposits, accelerating the collapse of banks.

8. Disruptions in Trade Finance: Banks play a critical role in facilitating international trade. Banking instability could disrupt trade finance, impacting global supply chains and raising import/export costs for businesses.

9. Increased Borrowing Costs: Even if banks continue lending, borrowing costs are likely to rise as banks become more risk-averse. This could squeeze profit margins for businesses.

10. Difficulty Managing Debt: Many businesses, especially those that borrowed heavily during low-interest-rate periods, could struggle to manage their debt if interest rates rise due to bank losses.

11. Reduced Investment in Infrastructure: A financial crisis often leads to decreased government spending on infrastructure projects. This could hinder economic growth and create bottlenecks for businesses.

12. Erosion of Business Confidence: Uncertainty surrounding the banking system can create a climate of fear and hesitation among business leaders. This could lead to delayed investments and hiring freezes.

What Should Business Leaders Do?

Given these significant concerns, here are some proactive steps business leaders can take to protect themselves:

  • Diversify Funding Sources: Reduce reliance on bank loans by exploring alternative financing options, such as private equity, venture capital, or asset-based lending.
  • Strengthen Balance Sheets: Focus on building strong cash reserves and reducing debt levels to weather potential economic storms.
  • Stress Test Your Business: Conduct stress tests to see how your business would fare in various economic scenarios, including a banking crisis.
  • Develop Contingency Plans: Formulate contingency plans to ensure continuity of operations in case of disruptions in credit markets or banking services.
  • Stay Informed: Closely monitor economic news and developments within the banking industry to make informed business decisions.
  • Advocate for Stability: Work with policymakers and regulators to advocate for measures that promote a more stable and resilient banking system.

The current situation in the banking industry is a cause for concern, but it’s not a reason to panic. By taking proactive steps, business leaders can mitigate risks and ensure their businesses are positioned to weather any potential economic storm. Remember, a healthy banking system is essential for a healthy economy, and its stability benefits everyone.

Get help to protect and grow your business

Find out more

Subscribe for free business risk alerts and risk reviews

Connect with us

Read more business risk management articles

Connect with us 

Is the US banking system in trouble?

US Bank collapse latest news

The Looming Storm: Can the US Banking System Weather the End of the Lifeline?

March 2023 – a date etched in the annals of American finance. The spectre of another Great Depression loomed large as tremours ripped through the banking system. Three small-to-mid-sized banks imploded within a week, triggering a near-apocalyptic panic. Depositors fled, stocks plummeted, and whispers of systemic collapse hung heavy in the air. Then, the Federal Reserve stepped in, wielding a $160 billion bazooka dubbed the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) – a lifeline thrown to hundreds of vulnerable banks, staving off financial Armageddon.

But this lifeline has an expiration date – March 2024. As that date draws closer, a chilling question echoes across the financial landscape: Is the US banking system in trouble in 2024?

Understanding the Precipice:

Several factors conspired to push the banking system to the brink in 2023:

  • Aggressive Interest Rate Hikes: The Fed’s efforts to combat inflation through interest rate hikes backfired, squeezing banks’ profit margins and making it harder for them to service existing loans.
  • Shifting Market Landscape: The rapid increase in interest rates caught many banks with a portfolio overexposed to longer-maturity bonds, leading to significant value losses.
  • Overreliance on Uninsured Deposits: Many vulnerable banks became overly reliant on uninsured deposits, making them especially susceptible to panic-driven depositor runs.

The BTFP acted as a Band-Aid, providing desperately needed liquidity and preventing an immediate meltdown. However, it did not address the underlying issues plaguing the system. Now, with the program’s sunset approaching, the question on everyone’s mind is:

Will the End of the Lifeline Spell Doom?

The potential scenarios painted by analysts range from a ripple effect to a full-blown financial crisis:

  • Limited Bank Failures: The most optimistic scenario predicts a manageable number of additional bank failures, primarily among those already teetering on the edge. Deposit insurance would then kick in, mitigating the broader economic impact.
  • Widespread Contagion: A more pessimistic view suggests that the collapse of even a few large banks could trigger a domino effect, causing panic and widespread depositor runs across the system. This could lead to a credit crunch, freezing lending and plunging the economy into recession.

Navigating the Maelstrom:

Regardless of the severity of the unfolding crisis, one thing is certain – the Fed will not stand idly by. Its arsenal of potential responses includes:

  • Interest Rate Cuts: The Fed may be forced to reverse course on its tightening stance, slashing interest rates to spur lending and restore confidence in the banking system.
  • Quantitative Easing (QE) Revival: Printing money, a tactic abandoned during the QT era, could make a reappearance as a desperate measure to inject liquidity into the system.
  • Enhanced Regulatory Measures: Implementing stricter capital requirements and liquidity standards could improve the resilience of banks against future shocks.

Consequences for Everyone:

The ripple effects of a banking crisis would be far-reaching, impacting everyone from everyday citizens to Wall Street titans:

  • Consumers: Loan rates could soar, credit cards could become harder to get, and access to basic financial services could be disrupted.
  • Businesses: Investment and hiring could freeze, leading to job losses and dampening economic growth.
  • Markets: Volatility would reign supreme, sending stock prices into a tailspin and eroding investor confidence.

The Looming Verdict:

Whether the US banking system in 2024 becomes the scene of another financial nightmare or simply experiences a bumpy landing remains to be seen. The decisions made by the Fed in the coming months will hold the key to navigating this precarious terrain. One thing is for sure – the world will be watching with bated breath as the drama unfolds.

Beyond the Brink: A World Reshaped

The shadow of March 2024 looms large, a silent question mark scribbled onto the financial calendar. Whether the BTFP’s termination triggers a tremor or an earthquake depends on a complex interplay of forces. Understanding these forces is crucial, for they hold the key to navigating the potential storm and shaping the world on the other side.

Fault Lines of Vulnerability:

Five tectonic plates lie beneath the surface, waiting to be jostled:

  • Zombie Banks: Many banks, kept afloat by the BTFP, remain structurally unsound. With artificial life support withdrawn, their vulnerabilities could be exposed, triggering dominoes of failure.
  • Uninsured Deposits: The reliance on uninsured deposits, particularly among smaller banks, creates a ticking time bomb. A wave of panic withdrawals could quickly drain their coffers, pushing them over the edge.
  • Interconnectedness: The financial system is a spiderweb, with each thread intricately woven. The collapse of even a few key institutions could send tremors through the entire network, amplifying the crisis.
  • Global Spillover: The US banking system is not an island. A domestic crisis could quickly ripple across borders, impacting economies and markets worldwide.
  • Psychological Contagion: Fear, like wildfire, spreads with alarming ease. A sense of panic, once ignited, could lead to irrational behavior and exacerbate the economic downturn.

Navigating the Quake:

The Fed, the captain of this stormy ship, has a toolbox of measures at its disposal:

  • Interest Rate Twists: Cutting rates could stimulate borrowing and ease pressures on banks, but it risks reigniting inflation. Striking the right balance will be a delicate dance.
  • Quantitative Easing Redux: The return of QE, flooding the system with fresh money, could provide a temporary lifeline, but it could also contribute to long-term asset bubbles. The path chosen must be tread carefully.
  • Regulatory Reshaping: Tighter capital requirements and stricter oversight could strengthen banks’ resilience in the long run, but implementing them amidst a crisis could stifle lending and growth. Finding the right balance is paramount.
  • Transparency Torch: Clear and consistent communication from the Fed will be crucial in preventing panic and building public trust. Openness is the key to keeping calm amidst the storm.

The New Landscape:

The world on the other side of this potential crisis will be different, undoubtedly. Some potential scenarios to consider:

  • A Reshaped Banking Industry: Consolidation could accelerate, with larger banks swallowing weaker ones. Smaller, community-focused banks may struggle to survive in the new paradigm.
  • Technological Transformation: The dependence on traditional banking models could lessen, with fintech solutions offering greater resilience and accessibility. Blockchain and digital currencies may play a larger role.
  • Increased Regulation: The pendulum may swing towards stricter oversight, with tighter controls on risk-taking and lending practices. The balance between stability and innovation will be a constant struggle.
  • Global Repositioning: The US may lose some of its financial preeminence as other countries, with more robust banking systems, rise in prominence.The global financial landscape could be reshuffled.
  • Societal Shifts: Public trust in financial institutions could be shaken, leading to increased skepticism and calls for reform. The relationship between citizens and banks may require reimagining.

A Call to Action:

The story of March 2024 is still unfolding, its ending an enigma waiting to be deciphered. But one thing is clear: this is not a drama for passive spectators. We all have a role to play.

  • Citizens: Stay informed, engage in constructive dialogue, and hold financial institutions accountable.
  • Businesses: Build financial resilience,diversify your exposure, and be prepared for potential disruptions.
  • Policymakers: Act with foresight, implement well-calibrated measures, and prioritise systemic stability over short-term gains.

The potential storm can be navigated, and a brighter future built, but only through collective action, informed choices, and a shared commitment to a more robust and equitable financial system. The time to act is now, for the tremors of March 2024 could reshape the world in ways we can only begin to imagine.

Get help to protect and grow your business

Find out more

Subscribe for free business risk alerts and risk reviews

Connect with us 

Read more business risk management articles

Connect with us

Why did US and UK strike Yemen and what are the short term ramifications for business leaders and consumers

Short term ramifications are increased shipping costs, increased inflation risk and higher for longer interest rates. Medium to long term – World War 3!

A Spark in the Tinderbox: US-UK Strikes on Yemen Houthis and the Tangled Web of Global Risks

The recent US-UK airstrikes on Houthi rebel positions in Yemen have sent shockwaves through an already volatile region, igniting concerns about a wider escalation and its potential global ripple effects. While the immediate focus remains on the humanitarian crisis in Yemen and the uncertain trajectory of the conflict, the strike exposes deeper, interconnected threads: Iranian influence, Middle Eastern tensions, and a globalised economy precariously balanced on the edge. Exploring these connections reveals not only the potential for a cascading catastrophe like World War 3, but also the more tangible short-term risks of soaring inflation, disrupted supply chains, and a prolonged era of higher interest rates.

Fueling the Flames: Iran, Proxy Wars, and a Regional Tinderbox

The roots of the Yemeni conflict run deep, fuelled by a complex web of political grievances, sectarian divides, and external intervention. The Houthis, a minority Zaydi Shia group, rose to prominence in the late 2000s, clashing with the Sunni-dominated government and culminating in a full-blown civil war in 2014. Saudi Arabia, a regional heavyweight and Sunni power, intervened militarily in 2015, leading a coalition of mostly Arab states in support of the Yemeni government. The conflict has become a regional proxy war, with Iran backing the Houthis and seeking to counter Saudi influence in the region.

The US-UK strikes come against this backdrop of escalating tensions. Houthi rebels have stepped up attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea since the start of the Israel-Hamas conflict in October, targeting vessels in what they claim are retaliatory strikes against Israeli and Saudi Arabia. These attacks disrupt a vital global trade route, pushing up shipping costs and threatening fuel and other essential goods supplies.

The Iran Card: Global Calculus and the Escalation Ladder

Iran’s support for the Houthis casts a long shadow over the conflict. The US and its allies view Iran’s regional ambitions with deep suspicion, fearing attempts to destabilise the Middle East and challenge their interests. Any escalation in Yemen could draw Iran directly into the conflict, potentially triggering a wider regional war with devastating consequences. This fear factor plays a central role in the global calculus surrounding the airstrikes. While the US and UK maintain they aim to deter further attacks on shipping and protect commercial interests, their actions inadvertently risk stoking Iranian anger and pushing the region closer to a dangerous tipping point.

Beyond Borders: Tangled Threads and Unforeseen Consequences

The potential implications of a wider Yemen conflict extend far beyond the Middle East. Global energy markets remain under intense pressure, with rising oil prices fuelling inflationary pressures in major economies. Disruptions to Red Sea shipping could worsen these trends, further increasing energy and transportation costs and putting additional strain on already overstretched supply chains. The combination of higher inflation and slower economic growth could prompt central banks to raise interest rates faster and longer than previously anticipated, leading to financial instability and potential market crashes.

Moreover, the conflict casts a shadow on Chinese and Russian interests in the region. China enjoys strong economic ties with Iran and has invested heavily in infrastructure projects in the Middle East. A regional war could disrupt these investments and jeopardise China’s energy security. Russia, another major player in the region, maintains close ties with both Iran and Saudi Arabia, and a wider conflict could force it to navigate a delicate diplomatic tightrope.

World War 3: A Looming Specter or a Fear Mongering Fallacy?

The possibility of a World War 3 scenario triggered by the Yemen conflict might seem remote. However, it is crucial to understand the interconnectedness of the global system and how seemingly localised conflicts can quickly spiral outwards. Miscalculations, unintended consequences, and escalating proxy wars can create unpredictable chain reactions, dragging in major powers and unleashing devastating consequences. While the likelihood of a full-blown World War 3 may be low, the risk of a wider regional conflict that spills over into global economic and political turmoil remains a very real and concerning possibility.

A Call for De-escalation and Collaborative Solutions

The urgency of the situation demands a renewed emphasis on diplomatic efforts and de-escalation strategies. All parties involved in the Yemen conflict, including the Houthis, the Saudi-led coalition, Iran, and the international community, must come together to find a peaceful resolution. This will require compromise, dialogue, and a willingness to address the root causes of the conflict, including poverty, inequality, and the legitimate grievances of Yemen’s population.

Ignoring these realities and resorting to further military action will only lead to more death, destruction, and hardship for the Yemeni people. It will also heighten regional tensions, jeopardise global economic stability, and increase the risk of a disastrous escalation. The world cannot afford to stand idly by as Yemen becomes another tragic chapter in the long history of human conflict. We must collectively strive for a peaceful resolution that prioritises the suffering Yemeni people, protects vital trade routes, and prevents the devastating domino effect that could drag us all into a wider conflict. The stakes are high, and the time for action is now. Only through concerted diplomatic efforts, a collective commitment to de-escalation, and a genuine focus on addressing the underlying grievances can we extinguish the flames of war in Yemen and prevent them from engulfing the rest of the world.

Beyond the immediate need for de-escalation, the Yemen conflict offers an opportunity for reflection. It highlights the interconnectedness of our world, the fragility of global trade and security, and the urgent need for collaborative solutions to complex challenges. It is a stark reminder that conflicts, no matter how localised, can have far-reaching consequences, impacting economies, lives, and the very fabric of international order.

Investing in conflict prevention, promoting dialogue and understanding, and tackling the root causes of instability are critical steps towards a more peaceful and secure future. The lessons learned from Yemen must serve as a catalyst for proactive diplomacy, responsible global citizenship, and a renewed commitment to building a world where dialogue prevails over violence, and cooperation triumphs over division.

Get help to protect and grow your business

Find Out More

Subscribe for free risk alerts and risk reviews

Contact Us

Read more business risk management articles

Contact Us

Key Threat To USA Regional Banks and Wider Financial System Globally

Bricks and mortar last a long time but the work from home solution is a lasting problem for commercial property owners and the wider financial system stability

A Ticking Time Bomb: Risks of Renewing Commercial Property Loans in 2024

The American financial system stands on the precipice of a potential tremor in 2024. Not from earthquakes or stock market crashes, but from the quiet ticking of a time bomb: a vast swathe of commercial property loans approaching their renewal date. Over $1.5 trillion worth of these loans will mature next year, and the uncertain economic climate has cast a long shadow over their renegotiation, potentially triggering a series of cascading risks for the financial system.

A Perfect Storm of Uncertainties:

Several factors converge to create this precarious situation:

  • Shifting Market Dynamics: The pandemic’s impact on commercial real estate lingers. Office vacancy rates remain high, retail struggles to adapt to online shopping, and hospitality faces a new normal. These challenges erode property values, impacting the collateral backing these loans.
  • Rising Interest Rates: The Federal Reserve’s ongoing fight against inflation has driven interest rates upward. This significantly affects borrower affordability, putting pressure on them to repay or renegotiate at significantly higher interest rates, potentially pushing some into default.
  • Geopolitical Turbulence: The war in Ukraine and global supply chain disruptions add further pressure to the economic landscape. Higher energy costs and material shortages impact construction and operation costs,affecting tenants and ultimately, loan viability.
  • Regulatory Environment: Evolving regulatory guidelines around climate change and building standards could necessitate costly retrofits for older buildings, adding another layer of financial strain on borrowers and lenders alike.

The Cascade of Potential Risks:

If a significant portion of these loans experience distress or default, the consequences could ripple through the financial system:

  • Bank Stability: Banks heavily invested in commercial real estate loans could face significant losses, impacting their capital adequacy and lending capacity. This could lead to tighter credit conditions for businesses and individuals alike, hampering economic growth.
  • Investor Confidence: Weakening commercial real estate values could trigger a chain reaction, impacting other asset classes like real estate investment trusts (REITs) and mortgage-backed securities. This could lead to capital flight and market volatility.
  • Domino Effect: Defaults and distress in the commercial real estate market could have ripple effects on other sectors, particularly construction, hospitality, and retail, potentially leading to job losses and a broader economic slowdown.

385 American banks, most of them smaller, regional ones facing bankruptcy in 2024 due to bad commercial real estate loans up for renewal, according to a new report by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). Lower property values, increased interest rates, and declining office demand could lead more firms to default on their loans and fear of banking collapse will cause people to withdraw deposited money accelerating bank bankruptcies in USA.

Mitigating the Risks: Navigating the Labyrinth:

Avoiding these worst-case scenarios requires proactive measures from various stakeholders:

  • Loan Modifications: Lenders and borrowers need to work collaboratively to restructure existing loans, potentially extending terms or adjusting interest rates to reflect current market realities. Open communication and flexible solutions are crucial.
  • Government Intervention: Policymakers could consider targeted interventions like tax breaks or loan guarantee programs to incentivise investment and stabilise the sector. Measures to address affordability concerns in housing markets could also indirectly support commercial real estate by boosting tenant demand.
  • Industry Adaptation: The commercial real estate industry itself needs to embrace innovation and adaptability. Exploring alternative uses for struggling properties, embracing hybrid work models in office spaces, and fostering sustainable energy solutions can enhance viability and attract new tenants.
  • Diversification Strategies: Lenders need to diversify their loan portfolios to minimize exposure to any single sector. This could involve increasing their focus on sectors less vulnerable to economic downturns, like healthcare or infrastructure.

A Call for Vigilance and Collaboration:

The year 2024 looms large as a potential flashpoint for the American financial system. The fate of these maturing commercial property loans hangs in the balance, with their renegotiation holding the key to stability or potential turmoil. Vigilance, open communication, and proactive measures from lenders, borrowers, policymakers, and the industry as a whole are crucial to navigate this challenge and mitigate the risks. Ignoring the ticking time bomb will only amplify its potential explosion. By understanding the complexities of the situation and working together, we can chart a course towards a smooth renegotiation and a resilient financial future for America and beyond.

Subscribe for free business risk alerts to inform your business decision making to navigate major threats to your business and seize new business opportunities

Contact Us

Discover new ways to maintain and expand your business growth and build business resilience with BusinessRiskTV

Contact Us

Read more business risk management articles watch videos and receive risk reviews

Contact Us

The #1 Thing People Get Wrong About Lloyds Bank

Do not tar Lloyds bank with the same toxic brush of the UK banking industry

People think Lloyds bank is a big bad bank that was part of the financial crisis of 2008. Lloyds bank was in fact one of the hero’s of the financial crisis. Lloyds bank saved the Halifax brand including the Bank Of Scotland whose executives were the real baddies along with the Royal Bank of Scotland now Natwest. By saving the Halifax plc group of bank brands it helped stop the implosion of the UK economy.

If Lloyds bank had not stepped in when it did, Halifax plc group of bank brands would have collapsed and a major domino would have irreparably damaged the UK economy. If we thought it was bad economically with austerity and job losses in UK, without Lloyd’s intervention to takeover Halifax plc it would have been catastrophic. Anarchy on the streets would have resulted and the UK would have entered a period of lifespan that would have been worse than World War 2. We came back economically after Word War 2. If Lloyd’s bank had not stepped in the UK would be more like Venezuela now.

From the financial crisis Lloyds Bank has tried hard to make matters worse including but not limited to PPI scandal where more than £20 billion pounds worth of shareholder value was destroyed. Incompetent greedy executives poorly directed employees to make repeated missteps post financial crisis 2008 to make matters worse. Added to this Lloyds bank has had to manage the risks from external sources including Brexit and Covid-19 pandemic.

However Lloyds bank is now very far from the perceived bad bank it had become. Prior to the 2008 financial crisis Lloyds bank was a boring bank. Investors loved the fact it was a traditional boring bank. It’s share price was £6 plus and it paid out relatively gigantic dividends every year to support pension funds, pensioners and other investors. Lloyds bank had no choice but to take over basket case Halifax plc. If Lloyds bank did not takeover Halifax plc basket of bank brands it is likely that Lloyd’s bank would have collapsed due to the domino effect. As Halifax plc and Royal Bank of Scotland folded they would have swamped the position of Lloyds bank as the UK economy went into a nosedive it is unlikely to have recovered from for many decades, if ever.

The only positive for Lloyds bank’s takeover of Halifax plc bank brands is that in all other circumstances Lloyds bank would never have been allowed to takeover Halifax plc by the UK competition authorities. Lloyds would have become too powerful in the marketplace. As it is, the only real risk to Lloyds bank is that it could be broken up as it is too dominant in for example the mortgage market.

  • Lloyds is the biggest player in the UK mortgage market. In a marketplace where the UK housing market is booming a share price of less than £0.45 is a joke!
  • Lloyds bank has come through the PPI scandal. Having destroyed shareholder value in the past, the laws have been changed to largely cap any future payouts under the PPI heading.
  • Brexit has now happened. Whether this is good or bad for the UK economy depends on which half of the UK adult population stand on Brexit. What is perhaps clear is that if it is going to impact negatively on the UK business community it is not going to be catastrophic. It may even been hugely beneficial to UK businesses. Lloyds bank will not be significantly impacted negatively by Brexit and may be impacted on the positive side.
  • The Covid-19 pandemic is far from over. However the UK vaccination programme and its likely adaptation to combat virus variations means the UK economy is now through the worst. The only question is how good will the future be? Lloyds bank can easily navigate the future risks if, as it has done, navigated the worst of the pandemic in the UK.
  • Another enterprise risk management article looks at the UK economy as a whole in the spring of 2021. Essentially most things point to exceptional UK economic growth through 2021 and 2022. Lloyds bank is perhaps uniquely placed to take advantage of any such economic growth. Its strategy is based on making money from UK consumer and UK business confidence and growth, both of which are at record all time highs.
  • If interest rates rise it will give all banks more opportunities to be profitable. With UK interest rate at record low of 0.1 percent banks will win from interest rate rises. Interest rates are not going to go negative.
  • Unemployment in UK is a key threat to UK banks. However many predict the UK unemployment is not going to be any way near as bad as was feared due to pandemic. Indeed if the vaccination roll out continues as hoped, unemployment rates are likely to be slightly above pre-pandemic levels. Certainly not at levels that would threaten Lloyds bank profit.
  • Lloyds bank has comparatively high profit margin compared to many UK banks so is more protected from downside risks.
  • UK consumers have paid off debt and saved more during the pandemic. When their spending power is fully unleashed on the UK economy post June 2021 the UK is going to see an economic growth not experienced since post World War 2 period. Lloyds bank is ideally placed via mortgage and non-mortgage lending to take advantage of this revitalisation of UK economy.

Lloyds bank was never the bad bank. It had to takeover the greedy and incompetent at Halifax plc. During that process it has had to manage internal and external risk drivers. It is likely that Lloyds bank’s worst days are behind it. Lloyds bank would have to work really hard to screw up its current opportunities for exponential growth.

The #1 Thing People Get Wrong About Lloyds Bank