Tag: Banking Sector News

Banking Sector News With BusinessRiskTV

UK Banking: Leveraged Finance Threat – How to Protect Your Business from the Domino Effect

Beyond Banking Crisis: How Private Equity’s Grip on UK Finance Threatens Your Business

The Leveraged Finance Shadow: How Private Equity Threatens UK Banking Stability

The UK’s banking sector faces a growing threat: the rise of private equity (PE) firms utilising leveraged finance for acquisitions. Traditionally, leveraged finance, provided by banks, has been the cornerstone of PE buyouts. However,recent findings by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) paint a concerning picture.

UK Banks Exposed: A Measurement Gap

The PRA identified a critical gap in risk assessment practices. Several UK banks were unable to accurately measure their exposure to PE giants and the portfolio companies they hold. This lack of transparency poses a significant systemic risk. To address this, the PRA has mandated stress testing of these relationships, requiring banks to comprehensively assess the potential impact of various economic scenarios.

The Challenge for Chief Risk Officers:

Chief Risk Officers (CROs) in UK banks now face a critical challenge. The PRA expects them to “comprehensively identify, measure, combine, and record risks” associated with buyout funds and their portfolio companies. This necessitates a thorough re-evaluation of traditional risk management practices to accurately assess the complex and interconnected web of leverage inherent in PE-backed acquisitions.

Beyond Measurement: The Ripple Effect

The impact goes beyond mere measurement. Here’s how the rise of PE-driven leveraged finance can destabilise the UK banking system:

  • Increased Leverage: PE firms often rely heavily on debt financing through leveraged loans. This can make banks holding these loans vulnerable to economic downturns. A default by a PE-backed company could trigger a domino effect, impacting the entire financial system.
  • Short-Termism vs. Long-Term Stability: PE’s focus on short-term returns can incentivise aggressive financial engineering in acquired companies. This can lead to higher risk profiles and potentially unsustainable debt burdens. Banks holding such loans could face increased risk of default.
  • Transparency Concerns: The complex structures of PE-backed acquisitions can be opaque. Layers of debt and ownership can make it difficult for banks to assess the true underlying risk of their exposure. This lack of transparency hinders effective risk management.

The Broader Impact: Businesses Beyond Banking

The instability in the UK banking sector due to leveraged finance can have a ripple effect on businesses across the economy. Here’s why:

  • Reduced Lending Capacity: Banks under pressure to manage risk from PE-backed deals might become more cautious in traditional lending activities. This could restrict access to credit for businesses outside the PE realm, hindering economic growth.
  • Focus on Fees Over Service: With a focus on maximising returns from PE deals, banks might prioritise high-fee financial instruments over traditional lending services. This can disadvantage businesses looking for affordable credit solutions.
  • Fragile Economic Foundations: Excessive leverage can create a system vulnerable to economic shocks. A financial crisis triggered by defaults in PE-backed acquisitions can negatively impact businesses of all sizes across the UK.

Building Resilience: Mitigating the Risks

While challenges exist, businesses can take steps to mitigate the risks associated with leveraged finance:

  • Diversify Funding Sources: Explore alternative funding options like asset-based financing, peer-to-peer lending,or crowdfunding. This reduces reliance on traditional banks and their leveraged finance practices.
  • Strengthen Financial Management: Build a strong financial foundation for your business by maintaining healthy cash flow, diversifying income streams, and implementing robust budgeting practices. This creates financial resilience, allowing for better negotiation with lenders.
  • Stay Informed: Keep yourself updated on developments in the UK banking sector, particularly regarding leveraged finance and PE involvement. Proactive awareness helps anticipate potential challenges and adapt strategies accordingly.

The Need for Proactive Risk Management

The complex landscape of leveraged finance necessitates a proactive approach to risk management for businesses and banks alike. By taking appropriate measures, we can work towards a more stable financial system and foster a healthy economic environment in the UK.

Looking for More Information?

This article provides a high-level overview of the challenges posed by leveraged finance and PE involvement in UK banking. If you’d like to delve deeper into risk management strategies or explore solutions for your business, feel free to contact us. Click here

Get help to protect and grow your business faster

Find out more about Pro Risk Manager 

Subscribe for free business risk alerts and risk reviews

Connect with us 

Read more business risk management articles for free

Connect with us

 

What is the default rate for commercial real estate in the UK?

What can we learn from Bayes Business School report on UK commercial real estate lending in 2023?

Navigating a Shifting Landscape: Key Findings from Bayes Business School Report on UK Commercial Property Lending and Protective Strategies for Business Leaders in 2024

The UK commercial property market is undergoing a significant period of transition. Rising interest rates, a potential economic slowdown, and the ongoing impact of the pandemic are all contributing to a more challenging environment for businesses with commercial property holdings. In this context, the Bayes Business School report on UK Commercial Property Lending provides valuable insights for business leaders seeking to navigate this complex landscape.

This article explores six key findings from the Bayes Business School report and outlines actionable strategies that business leaders in the UK can implement in 2024 to protect their businesses and ensure long-term stability.

Key Findings from the Bayes Business School Report:

  1. Looming Refinancing Challenges: A significant portion of outstanding UK commercial property loans (nearly 40%) are due to mature in 2024 and 2025. These loans were often secured at much lower interest rates than those currently available. While a wave of defaults was anticipated in 2023, it did not materialise. However, this is likely a temporary reprieve. As these loans mature, businesses will face the challenge of refinancing at higher rates, potentially putting a strain on cash flow.

  2. Reduced Lending Activity: The report highlights a significant decline in commercial real estate lending activity in the first half of 2023. Compared to the same period in 2022, lending volume dropped by nearly a quarter. This decrease reflects lenders’ cautious approach in a volatile market and stricter lending criteria. Businesses seeking new loans or refinancing may encounter difficulties and may need to present strong financial cases to secure funding.

  3. Shifting Lender Focus: The report indicates a shift in lenders’ focus towards specific property segments. While some lenders remain open to financing various property types, others are increasingly specialising in certain sectors like logistics or residential. This trend suggests that businesses may need to tailor their strategies to align with the specific lending preferences of different institutions.

  4. Importance of Hedging Strategies: The report emphasises the importance of robust hedging strategies for businesses with commercial property loans. With interest rates on the rise, businesses that did not hedge their loans against rising rates are likely to face significantly higher borrowing costs during refinancing. The report highlights the need for careful financial planning and effective negotiation of hedging terms within loan agreements.

  5. Impact of Declining Property Values: Average real estate values in the UK have fallen by more than 20% since mid-2022. This decline can negatively impact loan-to-value (LTV) ratios, potentially putting some businesses in breach of their loan covenants. Businesses may need to consider asset valuation strategies or explore options to improve property cash flow to maintain compliance with loan terms.

  6. The Rise of Alternative Lenders: With traditional lenders becoming more selective, the report suggests a potential rise in activity from alternative lenders. These lenders may offer more flexible financing options, but often come with higher interest rates and stricter terms. Businesses considering alternative lenders should thoroughly evaluate the terms and conditions before entering into any agreements.

Protective Strategies for Business Leaders in 2024:

In light of the key findings from the Bayes Business School report, here are some actionable strategies that business leaders in the UK can implement in 2024 to protect their businesses:

  1. Proactive Loan Management:

    • Open communication with lenders: Maintain a close dialogue with your current lender to understand their expectations and potential refinancing options.
    • Explore early renewal: If your loan matures in 2024 or 2025, consider initiating conversations with your lender well in advance to explore early renewal possibilities at potentially more favourable rates.
    • Prepare a strong financial case: Develop a comprehensive financial plan that demonstrates your business’s ability to service the loan at higher interest rates.

  2. Strategic Asset Management:

    • Evaluate property performance: Conduct a thorough review of your commercial properties to assess their current and projected performance.
    • Explore value-enhancing strategies: Consider cost-saving measures or renovations that could improve the value of your property and strengthen your LTV ratio.
    • Diversify your property portfolio: If possible, explore opportunities to diversify your property holdings across different sectors to mitigate risk.

  3. Hedging Strategies:

    • Review existing hedges: Analyse the effectiveness of your existing hedging strategies and consider adjustments to ensure adequate protection against future interest rate fluctuations.
    • Explore new hedging options: If you haven’t already, investigate potential hedging instruments like interest rate swaps or caps to manage borrowing costs.

  4. Alternative Lending Options:

    • Research alternative lenders: Become familiar with the terms and conditions offered by alternative lenders, understanding their potential benefits and drawbacks.
    • Negotiate effectively: If you choose to pursue an alternative lender, carefully negotiate terms and ensure the loan aligns with your long-term financial goals.

  5. Building Cash Flow Resilience:

    • Cost-cutting measures: Implement strategic cost-cutting initiatives to improve your cash flow and create a buffer for potential increases in borrowing costs.
    • Explore new revenue streams: Seek opportunities to diversify your income streams and reduce dependence on rental income from commercial properties.

  6. Staying Informed:

    • Monitor market trends: Closely monitor economic and real estate market trends to anticipate potential challenges and opportunities.
    • Seek professional advice: Consult with financial advisors and legal counsel experienced in commercial property matters to navigate complex financial decisions.

By implementing these strategies, business leaders in the UK can navigate the current market uncertainties and ensure the long-term stability of their businesses. The key takeaway from the Bayes Business School report is the importance of proactive planning and adaptability. Businesses that can adjust their strategies, manage their finances prudently, and capitalise on emerging opportunities will be well-positioned to thrive in this evolving landscape.

Looking Ahead

The UK commercial property market outlook for 2024 remains uncertain. However, by understanding the key trends highlighted in the Bayes Business School report and taking proactive measures, businesses can mitigate risks and build resilience. The ability to adapt, manage cash flow effectively, and explore alternative financing solutions will be crucial for success in the coming years.

Get help to protect and grow your business

Find out more

Subscribe for free business risk alerts and risk reviews

Connect with  us

Read more business risk management articles

Connect with us

 

How much unrealised losses do banks have?

Banks unrealised losses

12 Reasons Why Business Leaders Should Be Worried About Banking Industry Bond Losses

A U.S. Banking and Economy Expert’s Perspective

As a U.S. banking and economy expert, I’m deeply concerned about the potential materialisation of significant bond losses within the banking industry. The recent news of Bank of America experiencing a staggering $109 billion loss in its bond portfolio during the first quarter of 2024 serves as a stark warning sign. This isn’t an isolated incident, and business leaders across America and the globe would be wise to heed this call.

Here are 12 key reasons why banking industry bond losses should be a major concern for business leaders:

1. A Domino Effect: Banks are interconnected. Losses at one institution can trigger a chain reaction, causing instability and potential failure within others. This could disrupt lending, credit markets, and overall economic activity.

2. Tightened Lending: If banks experience significant losses, they may become more cautious in their lending practices. This could restrict access to capital for businesses, hindering growth and investment.

3. Market Contagion: Banking industry pain can quickly spread to other sectors. Stock markets could plummet, eroding investor confidence and impacting business valuations.

4. Global Financial Crisis Echoes: The 2008 financial crisis serves as a stark reminder of how interconnected financial institutions are. A banking collapse could trigger a similar global crisis with devastating consequences.

5. Interest Rate Uncertainty: While the Federal Reserve has signalled no change interest rates could call in 2024, U.S. inflation had risen for the last 5 months, the geopolitical world indicates rising fuel placing more pressure on price rises and unemployment and wages indicate a need for higher for longer interest rates. Rising rates in the future could further exacerbate banking industry bond losses yet to fully be realised. They are already there they just have not been recognised fully.

6. Corporate Bond Exposure: Many businesses rely on corporate bonds for financing. If these bonds lose value due to bank selling or defaults, it could strain corporate finances and lead to bankruptcies.

7. Consumer Confidence Decline: Public trust in the banking system is crucial for a healthy economy. Widespread news of bank losses could erode consumer confidence, leading to decreased spending and investment. It could also spark a run on banking deposits, accelerating the collapse of banks.

8. Disruptions in Trade Finance: Banks play a critical role in facilitating international trade. Banking instability could disrupt trade finance, impacting global supply chains and raising import/export costs for businesses.

9. Increased Borrowing Costs: Even if banks continue lending, borrowing costs are likely to rise as banks become more risk-averse. This could squeeze profit margins for businesses.

10. Difficulty Managing Debt: Many businesses, especially those that borrowed heavily during low-interest-rate periods, could struggle to manage their debt if interest rates rise due to bank losses.

11. Reduced Investment in Infrastructure: A financial crisis often leads to decreased government spending on infrastructure projects. This could hinder economic growth and create bottlenecks for businesses.

12. Erosion of Business Confidence: Uncertainty surrounding the banking system can create a climate of fear and hesitation among business leaders. This could lead to delayed investments and hiring freezes.

What Should Business Leaders Do?

Given these significant concerns, here are some proactive steps business leaders can take to protect themselves:

  • Diversify Funding Sources: Reduce reliance on bank loans by exploring alternative financing options, such as private equity, venture capital, or asset-based lending.
  • Strengthen Balance Sheets: Focus on building strong cash reserves and reducing debt levels to weather potential economic storms.
  • Stress Test Your Business: Conduct stress tests to see how your business would fare in various economic scenarios, including a banking crisis.
  • Develop Contingency Plans: Formulate contingency plans to ensure continuity of operations in case of disruptions in credit markets or banking services.
  • Stay Informed: Closely monitor economic news and developments within the banking industry to make informed business decisions.
  • Advocate for Stability: Work with policymakers and regulators to advocate for measures that promote a more stable and resilient banking system.

The current situation in the banking industry is a cause for concern, but it’s not a reason to panic. By taking proactive steps, business leaders can mitigate risks and ensure their businesses are positioned to weather any potential economic storm. Remember, a healthy banking system is essential for a healthy economy, and its stability benefits everyone.

Get help to protect and grow your business

Find out more

Subscribe for free business risk alerts and risk reviews

Connect with us

Read more business risk management articles

Connect with us 

Is the US banking system in trouble?

US Bank collapse latest news

The Looming Storm: Can the US Banking System Weather the End of the Lifeline?

March 2023 – a date etched in the annals of American finance. The spectre of another Great Depression loomed large as tremours ripped through the banking system. Three small-to-mid-sized banks imploded within a week, triggering a near-apocalyptic panic. Depositors fled, stocks plummeted, and whispers of systemic collapse hung heavy in the air. Then, the Federal Reserve stepped in, wielding a $160 billion bazooka dubbed the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) – a lifeline thrown to hundreds of vulnerable banks, staving off financial Armageddon.

But this lifeline has an expiration date – March 2024. As that date draws closer, a chilling question echoes across the financial landscape: Is the US banking system in trouble in 2024?

Understanding the Precipice:

Several factors conspired to push the banking system to the brink in 2023:

  • Aggressive Interest Rate Hikes: The Fed’s efforts to combat inflation through interest rate hikes backfired, squeezing banks’ profit margins and making it harder for them to service existing loans.
  • Shifting Market Landscape: The rapid increase in interest rates caught many banks with a portfolio overexposed to longer-maturity bonds, leading to significant value losses.
  • Overreliance on Uninsured Deposits: Many vulnerable banks became overly reliant on uninsured deposits, making them especially susceptible to panic-driven depositor runs.

The BTFP acted as a Band-Aid, providing desperately needed liquidity and preventing an immediate meltdown. However, it did not address the underlying issues plaguing the system. Now, with the program’s sunset approaching, the question on everyone’s mind is:

Will the End of the Lifeline Spell Doom?

The potential scenarios painted by analysts range from a ripple effect to a full-blown financial crisis:

  • Limited Bank Failures: The most optimistic scenario predicts a manageable number of additional bank failures, primarily among those already teetering on the edge. Deposit insurance would then kick in, mitigating the broader economic impact.
  • Widespread Contagion: A more pessimistic view suggests that the collapse of even a few large banks could trigger a domino effect, causing panic and widespread depositor runs across the system. This could lead to a credit crunch, freezing lending and plunging the economy into recession.

Navigating the Maelstrom:

Regardless of the severity of the unfolding crisis, one thing is certain – the Fed will not stand idly by. Its arsenal of potential responses includes:

  • Interest Rate Cuts: The Fed may be forced to reverse course on its tightening stance, slashing interest rates to spur lending and restore confidence in the banking system.
  • Quantitative Easing (QE) Revival: Printing money, a tactic abandoned during the QT era, could make a reappearance as a desperate measure to inject liquidity into the system.
  • Enhanced Regulatory Measures: Implementing stricter capital requirements and liquidity standards could improve the resilience of banks against future shocks.

Consequences for Everyone:

The ripple effects of a banking crisis would be far-reaching, impacting everyone from everyday citizens to Wall Street titans:

  • Consumers: Loan rates could soar, credit cards could become harder to get, and access to basic financial services could be disrupted.
  • Businesses: Investment and hiring could freeze, leading to job losses and dampening economic growth.
  • Markets: Volatility would reign supreme, sending stock prices into a tailspin and eroding investor confidence.

The Looming Verdict:

Whether the US banking system in 2024 becomes the scene of another financial nightmare or simply experiences a bumpy landing remains to be seen. The decisions made by the Fed in the coming months will hold the key to navigating this precarious terrain. One thing is for sure – the world will be watching with bated breath as the drama unfolds.

Beyond the Brink: A World Reshaped

The shadow of March 2024 looms large, a silent question mark scribbled onto the financial calendar. Whether the BTFP’s termination triggers a tremor or an earthquake depends on a complex interplay of forces. Understanding these forces is crucial, for they hold the key to navigating the potential storm and shaping the world on the other side.

Fault Lines of Vulnerability:

Five tectonic plates lie beneath the surface, waiting to be jostled:

  • Zombie Banks: Many banks, kept afloat by the BTFP, remain structurally unsound. With artificial life support withdrawn, their vulnerabilities could be exposed, triggering dominoes of failure.
  • Uninsured Deposits: The reliance on uninsured deposits, particularly among smaller banks, creates a ticking time bomb. A wave of panic withdrawals could quickly drain their coffers, pushing them over the edge.
  • Interconnectedness: The financial system is a spiderweb, with each thread intricately woven. The collapse of even a few key institutions could send tremors through the entire network, amplifying the crisis.
  • Global Spillover: The US banking system is not an island. A domestic crisis could quickly ripple across borders, impacting economies and markets worldwide.
  • Psychological Contagion: Fear, like wildfire, spreads with alarming ease. A sense of panic, once ignited, could lead to irrational behavior and exacerbate the economic downturn.

Navigating the Quake:

The Fed, the captain of this stormy ship, has a toolbox of measures at its disposal:

  • Interest Rate Twists: Cutting rates could stimulate borrowing and ease pressures on banks, but it risks reigniting inflation. Striking the right balance will be a delicate dance.
  • Quantitative Easing Redux: The return of QE, flooding the system with fresh money, could provide a temporary lifeline, but it could also contribute to long-term asset bubbles. The path chosen must be tread carefully.
  • Regulatory Reshaping: Tighter capital requirements and stricter oversight could strengthen banks’ resilience in the long run, but implementing them amidst a crisis could stifle lending and growth. Finding the right balance is paramount.
  • Transparency Torch: Clear and consistent communication from the Fed will be crucial in preventing panic and building public trust. Openness is the key to keeping calm amidst the storm.

The New Landscape:

The world on the other side of this potential crisis will be different, undoubtedly. Some potential scenarios to consider:

  • A Reshaped Banking Industry: Consolidation could accelerate, with larger banks swallowing weaker ones. Smaller, community-focused banks may struggle to survive in the new paradigm.
  • Technological Transformation: The dependence on traditional banking models could lessen, with fintech solutions offering greater resilience and accessibility. Blockchain and digital currencies may play a larger role.
  • Increased Regulation: The pendulum may swing towards stricter oversight, with tighter controls on risk-taking and lending practices. The balance between stability and innovation will be a constant struggle.
  • Global Repositioning: The US may lose some of its financial preeminence as other countries, with more robust banking systems, rise in prominence.The global financial landscape could be reshuffled.
  • Societal Shifts: Public trust in financial institutions could be shaken, leading to increased skepticism and calls for reform. The relationship between citizens and banks may require reimagining.

A Call to Action:

The story of March 2024 is still unfolding, its ending an enigma waiting to be deciphered. But one thing is clear: this is not a drama for passive spectators. We all have a role to play.

  • Citizens: Stay informed, engage in constructive dialogue, and hold financial institutions accountable.
  • Businesses: Build financial resilience,diversify your exposure, and be prepared for potential disruptions.
  • Policymakers: Act with foresight, implement well-calibrated measures, and prioritise systemic stability over short-term gains.

The potential storm can be navigated, and a brighter future built, but only through collective action, informed choices, and a shared commitment to a more robust and equitable financial system. The time to act is now, for the tremors of March 2024 could reshape the world in ways we can only begin to imagine.

Get help to protect and grow your business

Find out more

Subscribe for free business risk alerts and risk reviews

Connect with us 

Read more business risk management articles

Connect with us

Key Threat To USA Regional Banks and Wider Financial System Globally

Bricks and mortar last a long time but the work from home solution is a lasting problem for commercial property owners and the wider financial system stability

A Ticking Time Bomb: Risks of Renewing Commercial Property Loans in 2024

The American financial system stands on the precipice of a potential tremor in 2024. Not from earthquakes or stock market crashes, but from the quiet ticking of a time bomb: a vast swathe of commercial property loans approaching their renewal date. Over $1.5 trillion worth of these loans will mature next year, and the uncertain economic climate has cast a long shadow over their renegotiation, potentially triggering a series of cascading risks for the financial system.

A Perfect Storm of Uncertainties:

Several factors converge to create this precarious situation:

  • Shifting Market Dynamics: The pandemic’s impact on commercial real estate lingers. Office vacancy rates remain high, retail struggles to adapt to online shopping, and hospitality faces a new normal. These challenges erode property values, impacting the collateral backing these loans.
  • Rising Interest Rates: The Federal Reserve’s ongoing fight against inflation has driven interest rates upward. This significantly affects borrower affordability, putting pressure on them to repay or renegotiate at significantly higher interest rates, potentially pushing some into default.
  • Geopolitical Turbulence: The war in Ukraine and global supply chain disruptions add further pressure to the economic landscape. Higher energy costs and material shortages impact construction and operation costs,affecting tenants and ultimately, loan viability.
  • Regulatory Environment: Evolving regulatory guidelines around climate change and building standards could necessitate costly retrofits for older buildings, adding another layer of financial strain on borrowers and lenders alike.

The Cascade of Potential Risks:

If a significant portion of these loans experience distress or default, the consequences could ripple through the financial system:

  • Bank Stability: Banks heavily invested in commercial real estate loans could face significant losses, impacting their capital adequacy and lending capacity. This could lead to tighter credit conditions for businesses and individuals alike, hampering economic growth.
  • Investor Confidence: Weakening commercial real estate values could trigger a chain reaction, impacting other asset classes like real estate investment trusts (REITs) and mortgage-backed securities. This could lead to capital flight and market volatility.
  • Domino Effect: Defaults and distress in the commercial real estate market could have ripple effects on other sectors, particularly construction, hospitality, and retail, potentially leading to job losses and a broader economic slowdown.

385 American banks, most of them smaller, regional ones facing bankruptcy in 2024 due to bad commercial real estate loans up for renewal, according to a new report by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). Lower property values, increased interest rates, and declining office demand could lead more firms to default on their loans and fear of banking collapse will cause people to withdraw deposited money accelerating bank bankruptcies in USA.

Mitigating the Risks: Navigating the Labyrinth:

Avoiding these worst-case scenarios requires proactive measures from various stakeholders:

  • Loan Modifications: Lenders and borrowers need to work collaboratively to restructure existing loans, potentially extending terms or adjusting interest rates to reflect current market realities. Open communication and flexible solutions are crucial.
  • Government Intervention: Policymakers could consider targeted interventions like tax breaks or loan guarantee programs to incentivise investment and stabilise the sector. Measures to address affordability concerns in housing markets could also indirectly support commercial real estate by boosting tenant demand.
  • Industry Adaptation: The commercial real estate industry itself needs to embrace innovation and adaptability. Exploring alternative uses for struggling properties, embracing hybrid work models in office spaces, and fostering sustainable energy solutions can enhance viability and attract new tenants.
  • Diversification Strategies: Lenders need to diversify their loan portfolios to minimize exposure to any single sector. This could involve increasing their focus on sectors less vulnerable to economic downturns, like healthcare or infrastructure.

A Call for Vigilance and Collaboration:

The year 2024 looms large as a potential flashpoint for the American financial system. The fate of these maturing commercial property loans hangs in the balance, with their renegotiation holding the key to stability or potential turmoil. Vigilance, open communication, and proactive measures from lenders, borrowers, policymakers, and the industry as a whole are crucial to navigate this challenge and mitigate the risks. Ignoring the ticking time bomb will only amplify its potential explosion. By understanding the complexities of the situation and working together, we can chart a course towards a smooth renegotiation and a resilient financial future for America and beyond.

Subscribe for free business risk alerts to inform your business decision making to navigate major threats to your business and seize new business opportunities

Contact Us

Discover new ways to maintain and expand your business growth and build business resilience with BusinessRiskTV

Contact Us

Read more business risk management articles watch videos and receive risk reviews

Contact Us

The #1 Thing People Get Wrong About Lloyds Bank

Do not tar Lloyds bank with the same toxic brush of the UK banking industry

People think Lloyds bank is a big bad bank that was part of the financial crisis of 2008. Lloyds bank was in fact one of the hero’s of the financial crisis. Lloyds bank saved the Halifax brand including the Bank Of Scotland whose executives were the real baddies along with the Royal Bank of Scotland now Natwest. By saving the Halifax plc group of bank brands it helped stop the implosion of the UK economy.

If Lloyds bank had not stepped in when it did, Halifax plc group of bank brands would have collapsed and a major domino would have irreparably damaged the UK economy. If we thought it was bad economically with austerity and job losses in UK, without Lloyd’s intervention to takeover Halifax plc it would have been catastrophic. Anarchy on the streets would have resulted and the UK would have entered a period of lifespan that would have been worse than World War 2. We came back economically after Word War 2. If Lloyd’s bank had not stepped in the UK would be more like Venezuela now.

From the financial crisis Lloyds Bank has tried hard to make matters worse including but not limited to PPI scandal where more than £20 billion pounds worth of shareholder value was destroyed. Incompetent greedy executives poorly directed employees to make repeated missteps post financial crisis 2008 to make matters worse. Added to this Lloyds bank has had to manage the risks from external sources including Brexit and Covid-19 pandemic.

However Lloyds bank is now very far from the perceived bad bank it had become. Prior to the 2008 financial crisis Lloyds bank was a boring bank. Investors loved the fact it was a traditional boring bank. It’s share price was £6 plus and it paid out relatively gigantic dividends every year to support pension funds, pensioners and other investors. Lloyds bank had no choice but to take over basket case Halifax plc. If Lloyds bank did not takeover Halifax plc basket of bank brands it is likely that Lloyd’s bank would have collapsed due to the domino effect. As Halifax plc and Royal Bank of Scotland folded they would have swamped the position of Lloyds bank as the UK economy went into a nosedive it is unlikely to have recovered from for many decades, if ever.

The only positive for Lloyds bank’s takeover of Halifax plc bank brands is that in all other circumstances Lloyds bank would never have been allowed to takeover Halifax plc by the UK competition authorities. Lloyds would have become too powerful in the marketplace. As it is, the only real risk to Lloyds bank is that it could be broken up as it is too dominant in for example the mortgage market.

  • Lloyds is the biggest player in the UK mortgage market. In a marketplace where the UK housing market is booming a share price of less than £0.45 is a joke!
  • Lloyds bank has come through the PPI scandal. Having destroyed shareholder value in the past, the laws have been changed to largely cap any future payouts under the PPI heading.
  • Brexit has now happened. Whether this is good or bad for the UK economy depends on which half of the UK adult population stand on Brexit. What is perhaps clear is that if it is going to impact negatively on the UK business community it is not going to be catastrophic. It may even been hugely beneficial to UK businesses. Lloyds bank will not be significantly impacted negatively by Brexit and may be impacted on the positive side.
  • The Covid-19 pandemic is far from over. However the UK vaccination programme and its likely adaptation to combat virus variations means the UK economy is now through the worst. The only question is how good will the future be? Lloyds bank can easily navigate the future risks if, as it has done, navigated the worst of the pandemic in the UK.
  • Another enterprise risk management article looks at the UK economy as a whole in the spring of 2021. Essentially most things point to exceptional UK economic growth through 2021 and 2022. Lloyds bank is perhaps uniquely placed to take advantage of any such economic growth. Its strategy is based on making money from UK consumer and UK business confidence and growth, both of which are at record all time highs.
  • If interest rates rise it will give all banks more opportunities to be profitable. With UK interest rate at record low of 0.1 percent banks will win from interest rate rises. Interest rates are not going to go negative.
  • Unemployment in UK is a key threat to UK banks. However many predict the UK unemployment is not going to be any way near as bad as was feared due to pandemic. Indeed if the vaccination roll out continues as hoped, unemployment rates are likely to be slightly above pre-pandemic levels. Certainly not at levels that would threaten Lloyds bank profit.
  • Lloyds bank has comparatively high profit margin compared to many UK banks so is more protected from downside risks.
  • UK consumers have paid off debt and saved more during the pandemic. When their spending power is fully unleashed on the UK economy post June 2021 the UK is going to see an economic growth not experienced since post World War 2 period. Lloyds bank is ideally placed via mortgage and non-mortgage lending to take advantage of this revitalisation of UK economy.

Lloyds bank was never the bad bank. It had to takeover the greedy and incompetent at Halifax plc. During that process it has had to manage internal and external risk drivers. It is likely that Lloyds bank’s worst days are behind it. Lloyds bank would have to work really hard to screw up its current opportunities for exponential growth.

The #1 Thing People Get Wrong About Lloyds Bank