Tag: actionable steps and solutions for enhancing business decision-making

Trade Tariffs 2025

How can supply chain risk owners mitigate impact of 2025 import tariffs

Navigating the Tariff Maze: A Supply Chain Risk Owner’s Roadmap for 2025

The global trade landscape just shifted again! April 2025 saw the implementation of new import tariffs across several key sectors, and if you’re a supply chain risk owner, you’re likely feeling the tremors. These aren’t just minor cost adjustments; they represent a fundamental reshaping of international commerce, demanding a proactive and strategic response. The stakes are high. A recent report by the International Trade Consortium estimates that these new tariffs could increase the cost of goods for some businesses by as much as 15% within the next year. Ignoring this reality is no longer an option; understanding and mitigating the risks while identifying potential opportunities is now paramount for supply chain resilience and growth.

This article dives deep into the implications of these 2025 import tariffs for supply chain risk management. We’ll explore the multifaceted ways these tariffs exert pressure on your operations, and more importantly, we’ll equip you with nine concrete strategies to not only weather the storm but also to potentially capitalise on the changing tides. So, buckle up, because navigating this new tariff terrain requires agility, foresight, and a willingness to adapt. Let’s get started!

What Do New Tariffs Mean for Supply Chain Risk Management in 2025?

The introduction of new import tariffs in 2025 throws a significant wrench into the well-oiled machine of global supply chains. For supply chain risk management, this translates into a heightened level of complexity and a broader spectrum of potential disruptions. It’s no longer just about managing supplier relationships or logistical hurdles; tariffs introduce a layer of financial and strategic uncertainty that permeates every aspect of the supply chain.

Think about it! Suddenly, the cost assumptions you’ve built your models on are no longer valid. The carefully negotiated prices with overseas suppliers might now be subject to significant surcharges, impacting your profit margins and potentially your competitive pricing. This immediate financial impact is just the tip of the iceberg.

These tariffs can trigger a cascade of risks across the entire supply chain ecosystem. They can lead to:

  • Increased Costs: This is the most direct and obvious impact. Tariffs act as a tax on imported goods, directly increasing the cost of raw materials, components, and finished products. This can squeeze margins, force price increases for consumers, and potentially reduce demand.
  • Supply Chain Disruption: As tariffs make certain import sources less attractive, businesses may need to rapidly shift their sourcing strategies. This can lead to disruptions as new suppliers are onboarded, quality control processes are established, and logistical networks are reconfigured.
  • Demand Fluctuations: Increased prices due to tariffs can lead to a decrease in demand for certain goods. Conversely, tariffs on competing products might create unexpected surges in demand for domestically produced alternatives or imports from countries not subject to the tariffs.
  • Geopolitical Instability: The imposition of tariffs can be a symptom or a cause of broader geopolitical tensions. This can lead to further trade disputes, retaliatory tariffs, and increased uncertainty in international trade relations, making long-term planning incredibly challenging.
  • Compliance Challenges: Navigating the complexities of new tariff regulations, including rules of origin, documentation requirements, and potential exemptions, can be a significant administrative burden and increase the risk of non-compliance penalties.
  • Increased Competition: Domestic industries protected by tariffs might become more competitive, putting pressure on businesses that rely on imported goods. Similarly, businesses in countries not subject to the tariffs might gain a competitive advantage in markets affected by them.

Essentially, new import tariffs amplify existing supply chain risks and introduce entirely new ones. Supply chain risk owners in 2025 must adopt a more dynamic and holistic approach to risk management, one that explicitly considers the impact of trade policy on every decision.

12 Reasons Import Tariffs Impact on Supply Chain Risk Management

The impact of import tariffs on supply chain risk management is far-reaching and multifaceted. Here are 12 key reasons why these tariffs demand the attention of every supply chain risk owner:

  1. Direct Cost Inflation: This is the most immediate and tangible impact. Tariffs directly increase the price of imported goods, leading to higher costs for manufacturers, distributors, and ultimately consumers. This erodes profit margins and can impact competitiveness. For example, a 10% tariff on imported steel directly increases the cost for automotive manufacturers relying on that material.

  2. Increased Price Volatility: Tariffs introduce uncertainty into pricing. Changes in trade policy or the threat of new tariffs can cause significant fluctuations in the cost of imported goods, making budgeting and forecasting more challenging. Imagine trying to set your product prices when the cost of your key components could change drastically overnight due to tariff adjustments.

  3. Sourcing Diversification Challenges: When tariffs make traditional import sources less viable, companies are forced to explore alternative suppliers, often in new geographies. This introduces risks related to supplier reliability, quality control, ethical labour practices, and differing regulatory environments. Finding a new supplier of specialised electronics components in a different country, for instance, requires significant due diligence.

  4. Logistical Network Disruption: Shifting sourcing patterns necessitates adjustments to logistics networks. New transportation routes, warehousing locations, and customs procedures need to be established, potentially leading to delays, increased transportation costs, and complexities in managing a more dispersed supply chain. Think about the logistical challenges of suddenly needing to ship goods from Southeast Asia instead of China.

  5. Working Capital Strain: Higher input costs due to tariffs can significantly increase the working capital requirements of a business. Companies need more funds to finance inventory and accounts payable. This can put a strain on cash flow, especially for smaller and medium-sized enterprises. Holding more inventory at higher tariffed prices ties up significant capital. 

  6. Demand Forecasting Uncertainty: Tariffs can impact consumer demand in unpredictable ways. Higher prices might lead to decreased demand, while tariffs on competing products could create unexpected surges. Accurate demand forecasting becomes significantly more difficult in this volatile environment. Predicting consumer reaction to price increases on everyday goods due to tariffs is a complex task.

  7. Increased Risk of Counterfeit Goods: As tariffs drive up the cost of legitimate imports, the incentive for counterfeit goods to enter the market increases. This poses risks to brand reputation, product safety, and ultimately consumer trust. The risk of counterfeit luxury goods flooding the market increases when tariffs make genuine items more expensive.

  8. Compliance and Regulatory Complexity: Navigating the intricacies of tariff regulations, including rules of origin, classification codes, and documentation requirements, can be a significant burden. Errors in compliance can lead to penalties, delays, and even seizure of goods. Understanding the specific HS codes and origin rules for each imported component becomes critical.

  9. Geopolitical and Trade Policy Uncertainty: Tariffs are often a tool in broader geopolitical strategies. This means that trade policies can change rapidly and unexpectedly, creating a high degree of uncertainty for businesses engaged in international trade. A sudden escalation in trade tensions between two major economies can have immediate and significant consequences for global supply chains.

  10. Erosion of Competitive Advantage: Businesses that rely on cost-effective imports may see their competitive advantage erode as tariffs increase their input costs. This can make it harder to compete with domestic producers or companies sourcing from regions not subject to the tariffs. A company that built its business model on low-cost imported textiles might suddenly find itself at a disadvantage compared to domestic manufacturers.

  11. Increased Risk of Supply Chain Bottlenecks: As companies rush to find alternative sourcing or adjust their supply chains, bottlenecks can emerge in transportation, warehousing, and customs processing. These bottlenecks can lead to delays and further increase costs. Ports and customs facilities might become overwhelmed as import patterns shift.

  12. Impact on Innovation and Product Development: Higher costs for imported components or materials can stifle innovation and product development. Companies may be forced to use less expensive, lower-quality alternatives or delay the introduction of new products. The ability to incorporate cutting-edge but tariffed technologies into new products might be hampered.

9 Ways Supply Chain Managers Can Avoid/Reduce the Negative Impact of Tariffs and Seize New Business Growth Opportunities from Tariffs

Navigating the complexities of new import tariffs requires a proactive and strategic approach. Here are nine ways supply chain managers can mitigate the negative impacts and potentially uncover new growth opportunities:

  1. Thoroughly Analyse Your Current Supply Chain Footprint: The first step is to gain a deep understanding of how the new tariffs will specifically impact your existing supply chain. This involves identifying all imported goods subject to tariffs, quantifying the potential cost increases, and assessing the reliance on specific suppliers and geographies. Conduct a detailed SKU-level analysis to understand the tariff implications for each product. Actionable Step: Create a matrix mapping your key imported materials and components against the new tariff rates and their origin.

  2. Explore Sourcing Diversification and Nearshoring/Reshoring: Reducing reliance on tariffed imports is crucial. Actively investigate alternative suppliers in countries not subject to the tariffs. Consider the feasibility of nearshoring (moving production closer to home) or reshoring (bringing production back to your domestic market). Evaluate the total landed cost, including transportation, lead times, and quality control, when considering new sourcing options. Actionable Step: Initiate conversations with potential alternative suppliers in tariff-exempt regions and conduct feasibility studies for nearshoring or reshoring key production processes.

  3. Renegotiate Contracts with Existing Suppliers: Engage in open and honest discussions with your current suppliers. Explore options for cost sharing, value engineering, or alternative pricing structures that might help mitigate the impact of tariffs. Long-term partnerships might involve collaborative efforts to find cost efficiencies throughout the supply chain. Actionable Step: Schedule meetings with key suppliers to discuss the tariff implications and explore potential contract adjustments.

  4. Optimise Inventory Management Strategies: In a tariff-heavy environment, efficient inventory management becomes even more critical. Carefully balance the need to avoid stockouts with the increased cost of holding inventory due to higher import prices. Explore strategies like postponement, where final product configuration is delayed until demand is clearer, or implementing more agile inventory models. Actionable Step: Review your current inventory levels and forecasting accuracy, and explore opportunities to implement more responsive inventory management techniques.

  5. Invest in Supply Chain Technology and Visibility: Enhanced visibility across your supply chain is essential for identifying potential disruptions and reacting quickly to changes. Invest in technologies like advanced analytics, real-time tracking, and supply chain mapping to gain a comprehensive view of your international flows and potential tariff impacts. Actionable Step: Evaluate and implement supply chain visibility platforms that provide real-time data on shipments and potential tariff-related delays.

  6. Seek Tariff Relief and Duty Drawback Opportunities: Explore potential avenues for tariff relief, such as applying for exemptions or utilising duty drawback programmes (refunds on duties paid on imported goods that are subsequently exported). Understanding the specific tariff regulations and available relief mechanisms can significantly reduce costs. Actionable Step: Consult with customs brokers and trade compliance experts to identify potential tariff relief or duty drawback opportunities relevant to your imports.

  7. Innovate Product Design and Material Usage: Consider redesigning products to reduce reliance on tariffed materials or components. Explore the use of alternative materials that are either domestically sourced or imported from tariff-exempt regions. This can lead to both cost savings and enhanced supply chain resilience. Actionable Step: Engage your R&D and engineering teams to explore product redesign options that minimise the use of tariffed inputs.

  8. Explore New Market Opportunities and Export Strategies: While tariffs pose challenges for imports, they can also create new opportunities in domestic markets or in countries where your products might now be more competitive due to tariffs on goods from other nations. Explore new export markets that might be less affected by the tariffs impacting your imports. Actionable Step: Conduct market research to identify potential new domestic or international market opportunities arising from the changed tariff landscape.

  9. Foster Collaboration and Communication Across the Organisation: Effectively navigating the tariff landscape requires strong collaboration between procurement, logistics, finance, sales, and legal teams. Open communication and shared understanding of the risks and opportunities are essential for developing and implementing effective mitigation strategies. Actionable Step: Establish a cross-functional task force to address the challenges and opportunities presented by the new import tariffs, ensuring alignment across all relevant departments.

By proactively implementing these strategies, supply chain managers can not only mitigate the negative impacts of the 2025 import tariffs but also position their organisations to seize new business growth opportunities in this evolving global trade environment. The key is to be agile, informed, and ready to adapt to the changing currents of international commerce.

Join Supply Chain Risks group

Supply Chain Risks
Supply Chain Risks

Get help to protect and grow your business faster with less uncertainty with BusinessRiskTV

Find out more about our Business Risk Management Club

Subscribe for free business risk management tips risk reviews and cost reduction ideas

Connect with us for free

Read more business risk management articles and view videos for free

Connect with us for free

Read more risk management articles and view videos:

  1. How can supply chain risk owners mitigate impact of 2025 import tariffs

  2. Best strategies for supply chain managers to avoid negative effects of new tariffs 2025

  3. What are the risks of 2025 import tariffs on global supply chain management and how to overcome them

  4. Ways to reduce negative impact of 2025 import tariffs and find new growth opportunities in supply chain

  5. Actionable strategies for supply chain risk owners to navigate and capitalise on import tariffs in April 2025

Supply Chain Risk Management
Supply Chain Risk Management Live and OnDemand

Relevant hashtags:

  1. #SupplyChainRisk

  2. #ImportTariffs2025

  3. #GlobalTrade

  4. #SupplyChainManagement

  5. #TradeCompliance

Trade Tariffs 2025

How flawed historical narratives impact enterprise risk management strategies

The connection between historical inaccuracies and bad risk management. How to improve you business risk management to improve your business performance with less uncertainty.

History. It’s the bedrock, right? The solid ground upon which we build our understanding of the present, and plan for the future. But what if that bedrock is riddled with cracks, fissures, and outright fabrications? What if the “facts” we cling to are merely the agreed-upon lies of a collective memory, shaped by biases, power struggles, and the ever-shifting sands of time?

History is often simply the agreed lies of what the past looks like. Rebel against the history we are creating today to ensure we have a better tomorrow. By Keith Lewis

Consider this: a staggering percentage of strategic business decisions, in fact, are based on historical analysis. But what if that history is wrong? We’re building castles on sand! In the realm of enterprise risk management, this is not just an academic musing; it’s a critical vulnerability. We believe we learn from the past. But are we really learning from reality, or are we simply reinforcing flawed narratives? I’ve seen it firsthand. We need to challenge the very notion of historical certainty. Because if we don’t, we risk repeating the same catastrophic mistakes, driven by illusions rather than genuine insight.

Enterprise Risk Management Magazine
Better Business From Better Risk Management Knowledge

The Unravelling Tapestry of “Truth”

Let’s dig deep. Let’s unearth the uncomfortable truths. Let’s rebel against the comfortable lies of history to forge a more resilient, informed, and ultimately, successful future.

Part 1: The Fabricated Foundations – Six Risk Event Falsehoods

Let’s dive into some specific cases where the perceived “facts” of risk events were demonstrably false, and how these falsehoods shaped subsequent risk management strategies.

  1. The Challenger Disaster: The O-Ring Myth.
    • The commonly accepted narrative surrounding the 1986 Challenger space shuttle disaster centred on the failure of the O-rings due to cold temperatures. This narrative became the cornerstone of risk management reforms at NASA. However, a deeper analysis revealed a far more complex picture. The O-rings were a contributing factor, yes. But the disaster was rooted in a culture of organisational pressure, flawed decision-making, and a systemic disregard for dissenting voices. The focus on the O-rings alone, while technically accurate, masked the deeper, more insidious risks within NASA’s management structure. Consequently, post-disaster reforms focused heavily on technical improvements, while neglecting the crucial organisational and cultural issues. This led to a false sense of security, which, in turn, contributed to the later Columbia disaster. It’s a tragedy, and it repeats.
  2. The 2008 Financial Crisis: The “Isolated Incident” Lie.
    • The 2008 financial crisis was initially portrayed as an isolated incident, a perfect storm of subprime mortgages and reckless lending practices. This narrative allowed many financial institutions to avoid fundamental reforms, clinging to the belief that the crisis was an anomaly. However, the reality was far more systemic. It exposed deep-seated flaws in regulatory oversight, risk modelling, and the very culture of Wall Street. The “isolated incident” lie prevented a thorough examination of these systemic risks, leading to a patchwork of regulatory changes that failed to address the root causes. The result? A financial system still vulnerable to future shocks.
  3. The Enron Collapse: The “Rogue Trader” Delusion.
    • The Enron scandal was often attributed to a few rogue traders and executives who acted independently. This narrative absolved the company’s broader culture and governance structures from responsibility. However, the reality was that Enron’s culture of aggressive accounting practices, unchecked ambition, and a complete lack of transparency permeated the entire organisation. The focus on “rogue traders” allowed many companies to believe they were immune to similar risks, as long as they kept a close eye on individual actors. This narrow view prevented a wider recognition of the systemic risks associated with corporate culture and ethical leadership.
  4. The BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: The “Technical Failure” Fallacy.
    • The Deepwater Horizon disaster was initially framed as a technical failure of the blowout preventer. While the blowout preventer did fail, the disaster was a culmination of systemic failures in risk management, cost-cutting measures, and a disregard for safety protocols. The “technical failure” narrative allowed BP and the industry to focus on improving equipment, while downplaying the crucial role of human error and organisational culture. This limited approach left the industry vulnerable to similar disasters, as the underlying systemic risks remained unaddressed.
  5. The Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster: The “Foam Strike” Misinterpretation.
    • Initially, the foam strike on the Columbia shuttle was seen as a minor, inconsequential event. The narrative was that the foam was a known, minor risk that posed no threat to the integrity of the shuttle. This was a critical misinterpretation. The reality was that the damage caused by the foam was significant and ultimately led to the catastrophic reentry. The misinterpretation arose from a culture of normalisation of deviance. Small deviations from expected outcomes were accepted over time, until they became the new normal. This led to a severe underestimation of the true risks involved. The risk management improvements made were too little, too late.
  6. The COVID-19 Pandemic: The “Foreign Threat” Simplification, lab-produced or natural evolution and building back better
    • The truth about the COVID-19 pandemic has yet to be unwrapped. Multi inquiries are ongoing. Personnel changes of key government bodies in America post recent election result may uncover more lessons to be learned from health risk management mistakes of COVID pandemic.

Part 2: The Business Risk Management Context – Challenging the Narrative

These examples illustrate a critical point: risk management strategies built on flawed historical narratives are inherently vulnerable. They create a false sense of security, blind us to systemic risks, and prevent us from learning from past mistakes.

  • The Problem of Confirmation Bias: We tend to seek out information that confirms our existing beliefs, even when those beliefs are flawed. In risk management, this can lead to a selective interpretation of historical data, reinforcing existing biases and preventing us from seeing the full picture.
  • The Danger of Simplification: Complex risk events are often reduced to simple narratives, focusing on isolated incidents or individual failures. This simplification obscures the underlying systemic risks and prevents us from developing effective mitigation strategies.
  • The Illusion of Control: We often believe that we have more control over events than we actually do. This illusion can lead to overconfidence in our risk management capabilities and a failure to anticipate unexpected outcomes.
  • The Impact of Organisational Culture: Organisational culture plays a crucial role in shaping how risks are perceived and managed. Cultures that discourage dissent, prioritise short-term gains over long-term sustainability, or normalise deviance are particularly vulnerable to risk events.
  • The Importance of Critical Thinking: Effective risk management requires a willingness to challenge conventional wisdom, question assumptions, and engage in critical thinking. This includes scrutinising historical narratives and seeking out alternative perspectives.
  • The need for accurate data: Data, when collected and analysed correctly is vital to risk management. However, when the data is wrong, or missunderstood, it can lead to terrible decsions.

Part 3: Reclaiming the Future – Nine Strategies for Improved Risk Management

To break free from the cycle of repeating past mistakes, we need to adopt a more critical and nuanced approach to risk management. Here are nine strategies to improve business intelligence, risk management knowledge, and business decision-making:

  1. Embrace Diverse Perspectives: Actively seek out and incorporate diverse perspectives into your risk assessments. This includes challenging your own biases and assumptions, and encouraging dissenting voices.
  2. Conduct Root Cause Analysis: Move beyond surface-level explanations and conduct thorough root cause analyses of risk events. This involves digging deep to identify the underlying systemic factors that contributed to the event.
  3. Develop Scenario Planning: Use scenario planning to explore a range of potential future outcomes, including those that challenge conventional wisdom. This can help you anticipate unexpected risks and develop contingency plans.
  4. Promote a Culture of Transparency: Foster a culture of transparency and open communication, where employees feel safe to raise concerns and report potential risks.
  5. Invest in Data Analytics: Leverage data analytics to identify patterns and trends that may indicate emerging risks. This includes using predictive analytics to anticipate future events.
  6. Enhance Risk Communication: Develop clear and effective communication strategies to ensure that risk information is disseminated to all relevant stakeholders.
  7. Implement Continuous Monitoring: Establish continuous monitoring systems to track key risk indicators and identify potential threats in real-time.
  8. Foster a Learning Organisation: Create a culture of continuous learning, where mistakes are seen as opportunities for improvement. This includes conducting post-event reviews and sharing lessons learned.
  9. Challenge Historical Narratives: Encourage critical examination of historical narratives and challenge assumptions about the past. This includes seeking out alternative perspectives and questioning the “facts” that are commonly accepted.

Conclusion: The Responsibility of Reinterpretation

History is not a static entity; it is a living, breathing narrative that is constantly being reinterpreted. We have a responsibility to challenge the comfortable lies of the past and to create a more accurate and nuanced understanding of our history. By doing so, we can build a more resilient, informed, and ultimately, successful future. In the realm of enterprise risk management, this means moving beyond simplistic narratives and embracing a more critical and holistic approach.

We must recognise that the stories we tell ourselves about the past shape our perceptions of the present and our expectations for the future. When those stories are flawed, so too are our decisions.

Consider the implications. If we continue to accept historical narratives without question, we risk repeating the same mistakes, driven by illusions rather than genuine insight. We become trapped in a cycle of reactive management, constantly responding to crises that could have been avoided.

But there is another path. We can choose to be active participants in the construction of our own narratives. We can choose to challenge assumptions, question conventional wisdom, and seek out alternative perspectives. We can choose to embrace the complexity of history and to learn from its lessons, even when those lessons are uncomfortable.

This requires a shift in mindset. It requires a willingness to acknowledge our own biases and limitations. It requires a commitment to continuous learning and improvement.

In practical terms, it means:

  • Cultivating a culture of intellectual curiosity: Encourage your teams to ask “why” and “what if.” Promote open dialogue and debate.
  • Investing in critical thinking training: Equip your employees with the tools and skills they need to analyse information and identify biases.
  • Building diverse teams: Seek out individuals with different backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences.
  • Implementing robust data governance: Ensure that your data is accurate, reliable, and accessible.
  • Establishing independent review processes: Create mechanisms for challenging assumptions and validating findings.

By taking these steps, we can move beyond the limitations of flawed historical narratives and create a more informed and resilient organisation.

Remember, the future is not predetermined. It is shaped by the choices we make today. And those choices are informed by the stories we tell ourselves about the past.

Let us choose to tell stories that are grounded in reality, that embrace complexity, and that empower us to create a better tomorrow. Let us rebel against the comfortable lies, and embrace the challenging truths. For in doing so, we not only rewrite history, we rewrite our future.

The responsibility to reinterpret, to question, and to learn, rests with each of us. The time to begin is now. Let’s build a future founded on accurate understanding, and not on the shifting sands of agreed upon falsehoods.

Get help to protect and grow your business faster with more certainty

Find out more about Business Risk Management Club

Subscribe for free business risk management tips risk reviews and cost reduction ideas

Connect with us for free

Read more business risk management articles and view videos on risk management for free

Connect with us for free

Business Risk Management Insights

Read risk management articles in full and view videos:

  1. How flawed historical narratives impact enterprise risk management strategies
  2. Examples of risk management failures due to misinterpreted historical data
  3. Strategies for improving business intelligence by challenging accepted historical facts
  4. Why traditional risk management models fail when based on agreed upon historical lies
  5. Implementing critical thinking in risk analysis to avoid repeating historical business mistakes

Risk Today

Nature Of Risk In Business

Business Risk Management : Enterprise Risk Management In Business

Risk Strategy: Risk Management Strategies

Stagflation UK 2025: Strategies for Business Leaders

Relevant hashtags :

  1. #RiskManagementReality
  2. #ChallengingHistory
  3. #BusinessIntelligenceInsights
  4. #StrategicRiskAnalysis
  5. #UnlearnRepeat

How flawed historical narratives impact enterprise risk management strategies