Tag: UK Risk Management Magazine

UK Risk Management Magazine

Is The Failure of Risk Management Worth It? 2026 Review | BusinessRiskTV

BusinessRiskTV reviews Douglas W. Hubbard’s The Failure of Risk Management—why heat maps fail and how quantitative risk analysis fixes ERM in 2026.

BusinessRiskTV Book Review: The Failure of Risk Management

BusinessRiskTV Business Risk Management Club recommends this book product as the solution to the problem of poor enterprise risk management application in business.

That recommendation carries weight because the problem is measurable. 65% of UK organisations now believe a serious cyber attack could threaten their survival, yet 1 in 5 have chosen not to report a serious cyber incident to avoid negative consequences. With economic uncertainty cited by 29% of UK trading businesses as their top challenge affecting turnover in September 2026, and 28% reporting decreased turnover, the gap between how businesses think they manage risk and how they actually do is costing real money. Hubbard’s book confronts that gap head-on.‌

What Is The Failure of Risk Management About?

The Failure of Risk Management explains why common risk management techniques are causing bad decision-making and provides a practical framework for adopting accurate, quantitative risk analysis methodology. Renowned risk analysis expert Douglas W. Hubbard argues that many popular risk management methods are “mere placebos which do nothing to reduce risk and improve decisions”. The book is divided into three parts: an introduction to risk analysis, a critique of what is broken, and a practical guide to fixing it.‌‌

Hubbard’s core argument is that qualitative methods like risk matrices and heat maps look sophisticated but are often misleading. He presents a convincing case for probabilistic risk analysis using Monte Carlo simulation as the best approach. The second edition includes updated case studies and expanded guidance on probability modelling, emphasising the efficacy of appropriate risk methodology in practical applications.

Why Should Risk Officers and Business Leaders Read This Book in 2026?

Risk officers and business leaders should read this book in 2026 because the gap between qualitative risk theatre and quantitative risk reality has never been more costly, as current UK business data demonstrates. The UK Government’s own 2026 National Risk Register acknowledges that “the risks the UK faces are more volatile, varied and interconnected than any time in living memory,” listing 95 distinct risks including 87 standalone risks and 8 linked scenarios. Yet the Government Major Projects Report at the end of March 2026 revealed that only 15% of major projects held a Green rating, while 58% were Amber and 18% were Red. These are the very projects where quantitative risk modelling should be standard practice.

Hubbard’s critique is not abstract. The Wood Group was fined almost £13m in March 2026 for failures in financial reporting and systems of controls, with the FCA citing a “poor financial culture”. Carillion’s former finance directors were fined for failing to reflect serious financial troubles in company announcements. These are not failures of risk identification—they are failures of risk quantification and honest communication. Hubbard’s framework directly addresses these systemic weaknesses.

Who Will Benefit Most from Buying and Applying This Book?

Risk officers, compliance teams, project managers, CFOs, board members, and enterprise risk management professionals will benefit most from buying and applying this book. The book targets management consultants and economists primarily, but Hubbard offers important suggestions for war quants and actuaries as well. Specifically:‌

  • Risk officers seeking to move from qualitative heat maps to quantitative modelling will find a step-by-step methodology for calibration and probability estimation
  • Compliance teams facing increasing regulatory scrutiny—the FCA’s actions against Wood Group and Carillion directors show that regulators now expect boards to monitor risk management frameworks effectively
  • Project managers managing complex programmes will benefit from Hubbard’s practical rules for risk registers, including the principle that risks requiring executive notification belong on the register, while those with trivial impacts do not‌
  • CFOs and finance directors grappling with supply chain disruptions—70% of UK businesses have faced greater financial exposure due to supply chain instability, with average annual collection costs rising to over £420,000‌
  • Board members who need to understand why “seeing all risks displayed in an organised, visual format” does not mean they are under control‌

When Should Potential Buyers Buy This Book?

Potential buyers should buy this book immediately if their organisation currently relies on qualitative heat maps, colour-coded risk matrices, or consensus-based risk scoring, because these methods are failing under the weight of 2026’s interconnected risk landscape. The timing is critical for several reasons:

  • Regulatory pressure is intensifying: The UK Corporate Governance Code now asks boards to monitor company risk management and their controls frameworks, yet many boards lack the quantitative tools to do so
  • Cyber risk is existential: 65% of UK organisations say a serious cyber attack could threaten their survival, and AI-driven attacks have more than doubled in frequency over the last 12 months, now affecting 25% of organisations‌
  • Supply chain volatility is structural, not temporary: 28% of UK businesses with 10 or more employees reported concern about international conflict impacting supply chains, while 21% were concerned about shipping disruption‌
  • The cost of inaction is quantifiable: Late payments cost the UK economy £11 billion annually, and 38 businesses close every day due to cashflow problems
    Buy the book before your next risk committee meeting. Buy it before your next board reporting cycle. The organisations that adopt quantitative methods now will be the ones still trading in 2027.

Where in the World Will Your Business Be to Take Advantage of This Book’s Knowledge?

UK-based businesses of all sizes—from SMEs to FTSE-listed corporates—will benefit most from this book’s knowledge, because the UK’s current risk environment provides the most immediate and measurable case for quantitative risk management. The UK is uniquely positioned to apply Hubbard’s framework:

  • UK SMEs are owed an average of £66,770 in late payments, and nearly half of UK companies expect the economy to deteriorate in the next 12 months
  • UK corporates face heightened governance scrutiny following the Carillion and Wood Group enforcement actions, making Hubbard’s methodology for demonstrating risk competence at board level directly applicable
  • UK public sector bodies managing the 95 risks in the National Risk Register need quantitative prioritisation to allocate limited resources effectively, as the Resilience Action Plan acknowledges the need to “assess how resilient the UK is to target interventions and resources”‌
  • UK critical national infrastructure operators in water, power, and communications face risks that Hubbard’s methods were originally designed to address—his approach draws from “nuclear power, exploratory oil, and other areas of business and government” where quantitative risk analysis is already standard practice

What Are the Key Takeaways for Business Decision Makers?

Key takeaways from The Failure of Risk Management that business decision makers can immediately apply include abandoning heat maps for quantitative methods, calibrating probability estimates, and using Monte Carlo simulation to model uncertainty. The most actionable insights are:

  • Heat maps create false confidence: Colour-coded risk matrices oversimplify complex risks, lack granularity, cannot account for risk tolerance, and encourage subjective assessment—yet executives treat them as rigorous analysis‌
  • Quantitative analysis is achievable without a PhD: Hubbard provides practical guidance on probability modelling and empirical inputs, showing that “you don’t need high levels of complexity or a PhD in math to make significantly better-informed risk management decisions”
  • Calibrate your experts: People do not naturally estimate probabilities well, but a little training can significantly improve accuracy—Hubbard provides tests in the appendix for calibrating probability estimations‌
  • Review past models against reality: The best way to know if a model works is to check how past forecasts performed—Hubbard checked over 100 of his own probability forecasts and found events predicted at 30% occurred approximately 30% of the time‌
  • Apply simple risk register rules: If the impact is so trivial you don’t need to tell anyone, it doesn’t belong on the register; if the probability exceeds 1 (it’s expected to happen), it’s not a risk but a project plan item‌
  • Learn from near misses: Treating near misses as successes rather than failures is a critical barrier to organisational learning that Hubbard identifies as a common failure mode‌

How Can You Maximise the Knowledge in This Book for Practical Business Benefit?

To maximise the knowledge in this book for practical business benefit, implement Hubbard’s four key measures: identify deficiencies in your current strategy, adopt a calibrated approach to risk analysis using up-to-date statistical tools, employ accurate quantitative risk analysis and modelling methods, and revisit your models against real outcomes. The practical implementation path is clear:

  • Start with a risk audit: Hubbard advises risk managers to identify deficiencies in their current strategy and fix them, rather than attempting a wholesale replacement of existing systems
  • Convert qualitative to quantitative: Where your risk register uses high/medium/low, convert these to probability estimates—”estimate the probability that the event will happen inside of the timeframe”‌
  • Use existing data before building new models: Where possible, review historical data to see what the real impact of similar events has been, rather than relying on subjective estimates‌
  • Frame risks in financial terms: Quantitative risk assessments assign numerical values to risks, allowing decision-makers to weigh the cost of each risk against its potential impact, enabling more strategic resource allocation
  • Establish feedback loops: Create a culture of purchase reflection where you document experiences, ask what happened and why, price assess reoccurrence likelihood, and identify practical steps to change outcomes‌
  • Join a community of practice: The BusinessRiskTV Business Risk Management Club provides access to exclusive webinars, workshops, and reports from leading risk management experts, with monthly risk intelligence briefings covering geopolitical, economic, and technological trends‌

Is The Failure of Risk Management Value for Money?

The Failure of Risk Management represents exceptional value for money when measured against the cost of poor risk management decisions that it helps prevent. Consider the arithmetic:

  • The book retails at approximately £39, while the average annual cost of collections from late payments alone has risen to £421,800 per business—a 14.5% increase from £368,400 in 2025
  • Cyber incidents cost UK small firms an average of $52,000 (approximately £41,000) per year and cause about 32 hours of disruption, yet average investment in cyber resilience measures stands at only $51,000—almost matching the cost of incidents themselves
  • Late payment costs the UK economy £11 billion annually, and 38 businesses close every day due to cashflow problems
  • The book’s insights, if applied to even one significant risk decision, could save an organisation many multiples of its
    Hubbard’s methodology has earned critical praise from Gartner and Forrester Research, and the second edition includes fresh examples from the 2008 credit crisis, natural disasters, outsourcing failures, and engineering disasters. As Sam L. Savage, Executive Director of ProbabilityManagement.org, wrote: “Some study the theory of risk management. Some actively engage in risk management and find that what works in theory does not always work in practice. Some develop new technologies that will make risk management work better in the future. Doug Hubbard does all three. That’s why this book should be your risk management must-read”.‌

Final Verdict

The Failure of Risk Management is essential reading for any business decision maker who suspects their current risk approach is not delivering genuine insight or protection. In a year where the UK terrorism threat has increased to SEVERE, the National Risk Register lists 95 distinct risks, and 65% of organisations fear cyber attack could threaten their survival, continuing to rely on colour-coded heat maps is not risk management—it is risk theatre. Hubbard provides the practical, proven alternative that business leaders need.‌

BusinessRiskTV Business Risk Management Club recommends this book product as the solution to the problem of poor enterprise risk management application in business.

Get help to protect and grow your business faster with BusinessRiskTV

Find out more about our Business Risk Management Club

Subscribe for free business risk management ideas risk reviews and cost of doing business reduction tips

Connect with BusinessRiskTV for free business risk management tips

Read more business risk management articles and view videos for free

Connect with BusinessRiskTV for free alerts to new business risk management articles and videos 

Your risk heat map is a placebo.

That’s not my line. It’s the uncomfortable conclusion Douglas W. Hubbard forces you to confront in The Failure of Risk Management: Why It’s Broken and How to Fix It.

And in September 2026, the numbers back him up.

65% of UK organisations say a serious cyber attack could threaten their survival. 1 in 5 have chosen not to report a serious cyber incident. ONS-linked business data shows 29% of UK trading businesses cite economic uncertainty as their top challenge affecting turnover. 28% report decreased turnover.

The UK Government’s own National Risk Register lists 95 distinct risks. The Government Major Projects Report at the end of March 2026 showed only 15% of major projects rated Green. 58% Amber. 18% Red.

Wood Group was fined almost £13m in March 2026 for financial reporting and controls failures. Carillion’s former finance directors were fined for failing to reflect serious financial troubles in company announcements.

Yet many boards still stare at red-amber-green heat maps and call it risk management.

Here’s the part most risk committees miss: Hubbard doesn’t just attack heat maps. He shows you what to replace them with. And the replacement does not require a PhD in math.

What to apply immediately:

  • Convert “high / medium / low” into probability estimates. If it’s a risk, ask: what is the probability this happens inside the timeframe?
  • Calibrate your experts. Hubbard checked over 100 of his own probability forecasts. Events predicted at 30% occurred approximately 30% of the time. Most organisations never test their experts this way.
  • Use Monte Carlo simulation to model uncertainty instead of arguing over colour codes.
  • Apply Hubbard’s risk register rule: if the impact is so trivial you don’t need to tell anyone, it doesn’t belong on the register. If the probability exceeds 1, it’s not a risk—it’s a project plan item.
  • Review past models against reality. If your 2024 risk register said “low likelihood” and it happened twice, your model is broken.
  • Treat near misses as data, not as successes. That is one of the biggest barriers to organisational learning Hubbard identifies.

    Wait—there’s more. This is where it gets expensive

    70% of UK businesses have faced greater financial exposure due to supply chain instability. Average annual collection costs have risen to over £420,000. Late payments cost the UK economy £11 billion annually. 38 businesses close every day due to cashflow problems.

    The book costs about £39. One avoided bad risk decision pays for it thousands of times over. That is not a book expense. That is risk management value for money.

    Who benefits most? Risk officers, compliance teams, project managers, CFOs, board members, and enterprise risk management professionals. When should you buy it? Before your next risk committee meeting. Before your next board reporting cycle. Where will it pay off? UK SMEs owed an average of £66,770 in late payments. FTSE corporates under FCA scrutiny. Public sector bodies managing 95 National Risk Register risks. Critical national infrastructure operators in water, power, and communications.

    Read to the end for the one question that exposes a broken risk process:

If your risk register disappeared tomorrow, what decision would actually change?

If the answer is “none”, you don’t have a risk process. You have risk theatre.

BusinessRiskTV Business Risk Management Club recommends this book product as the solution to the problem of poor enterprise risk management application in business.

Want the practical rollout? Email editor@businessrisktv.com with the subject line RiskClub for more information on BusinessRiskTV Business Risk Management Club.

#RiskClub #BusinessRiskTV

Book Under Review

The Failure of Risk Management: Why It’s Broken and How to Fix It by Douglas W. Hubbard

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Is The Failure of Risk Management Worth It? 2026 Review | BusinessRiskTV

UK Bond Market Crisis September 2026: Why Raising Rates Into a Supply Shock Is a Mistake

UK gilt yields have hit 5.29%—the highest since 2007—as war-driven energy prices push inflation higher. Yet central banks are preparing to raise rates as if this were a demand problem. It isn’t. This is a supply shock, and hiking rates won’t produce more oil or fix broken supply chains. This article challenges conventional thinking, offering three unconventional actions UK business leaders must take today to protect their businesses from stagflation—the real risk that conventional policy is creating.

“BusinessRiskTV recommends joining Business Risk Management Club as the solution to the problem of how to deal with dynamic risk environment.” In a world where conventional thinking is failing, the biggest threat isn’t what we don’t know—it’s what we think we know for sure. Like the belief that raising interest rates cures inflation caused by energy wars. It doesn’t. It just makes everything more expensive. This isn’t about playing it safe. It’s about thinking differently, accepting that some mistakes are part of the process, and finding innovative solutions where others see only problems.

Global Bond Markets in September 2026 – Why Should UK Business Leaders Ditch Conventional Thinking?

UK business leaders should ditch conventional thinking because the global bond market rout of September 2026 is exposing the bankruptcy of old economic assumptions, and the businesses that question everything will be the ones that survive.

The global bond selloff has pushed UK 10-year gilt yields to 5.29%—the highest since 2007—and 30-year yields to 5.92%, levels not seen since 1998. The immediate catalyst? War in the Middle East driving Brent crude above $95 a barrel. Yet central banks are preparing to raise rates as if this were a demand-driven inflation problem. It isn’t. This is a supply shock. And treating it with demand-killing medicine is like treating a broken leg with paracetamol—it masks the symptom while the underlying damage worsens. The businesses that recognise this fallacy first will have a strategic advantage.

—

Nine Facts That Challenge Everything You Think You Know

Fact 1: UK Gilt Yields Have Hit Levels Not Seen Since 1998

UK 30-year gilt yields have hit 5.92%, the highest since 1998, while 10-year yields reached 5.29%—the highest since 2007 . This isn’t a slow drift; it’s a seismic repricing. Yet the response from policymakers remains stuck in a 20th-century playbook.

Fact 2: Energy Prices, Not Consumer Demand, Are Driving This Crisis

Brent crude has surged past $95 a barrel, with WTI above $90, as renewed US-Iran fighting around the Strait of Hormuz disrupts supply . Eurozone inflation accelerated to 3.3% in August, with energy inflation particularly elevated. This is a supply-side shock, pure and simple.

Fact 3: The UK Economy Is Uniquely Vulnerable to Supply Shocks

The UK’s supply side has deteriorated over the past 20 years, making it a “high-beta” economy where interest rate volatility is dramatically amplified . With public sector net debt at £2.985 trillion—94.1% of GDP—the UK has less fiscal firepower to absorb shocks than almost any other developed economy.

Fact 4: Raising Rates to Fight Supply-Shock Inflation Is Illogical

Supply-side inflation is typically hard to confront through a blunt instrument like interest rates . Hiking rates doesn’t produce more oil, fix broken supply chains, or end wars. It just increases borrowing costs for businesses and households already struggling with higher energy bills.

Fact 5: The Old Bond-Equity Hedge Is Broken

Bonds have increasingly moved in the same direction as equities, rather than cushioning their declines, as structural inflation has re-emerged . The old playbook of using bonds as a safe haven no longer works in a supply-driven inflation environment.

Fact 6: Deglobalisation Is Making Inflation Structural, Not Temporary

Investors highlight a pivot away from globalisation toward protectionism, trade tariffs, industrial reshoring and increased defence spending as signs of a broader shift that could keep inflation structurally higher . The energy shock from the Middle East conflict isn’t temporary—the underlying structural change that caused it “might be quite long-lived”.

Fact 7: The Bank of England’s Chief Economist Admits the Dilemma

Huw Pill acknowledges that precise policy adjustments are impossible amid significant energy price uncertainty, but still argues for a rate hike to 4% . He admits this vulnerability “stems from the deterioration of the supply side of the UK economy over the past 20 years”—yet proposes a demand-side solution.

Fact 8: More Than 80% of Global Bonds Now Yield Above 4%

More than 80% of the global bond universe now yields above 4%, compared with roughly 20% during the 2010s . This represents a structural reset, not a cyclical blip. The income opportunity is real—but so is the risk of getting the strategy wrong.

Fact 9: AI and Tech Are Creating a Massive New Demand for Capital

Goldman Sachs forecasts $2.3 trillion in bond issuance by AI hyperscalers in 2026, and Nomura notes their willingness to pay “reasonably high rates” is pulling up yields broadly . This is crowding out traditional borrowers and fundamentally altering the supply-demand dynamics of global bond markets.

—

What Are the Real Risks and Unexpected Opportunities?

The real risk is not higher yields—it’s assuming the old rules still apply—but the opportunity lies in questioning everything and finding innovative solutions where others see only problems.

The Risks of Conventional Thinking

  • Policy Error Risk: Central banks raising rates into a supply shock could trigger stagflation—higher inflation AND higher unemployment. The UN has revised its global inflation forecast upward to 3.9%.
  • Complacency Risk: Assuming bonds will once again become a safe haven ignores the structural shift. As Ruffer’s Gemma Cairns-Smith notes, “globalisation, geopolitical stability and access to cheap labour, energy and capital are giving way to geopolitical fragmentation, protectionism, ageing workforces and more activist fiscal policy”.
  • Refinancing Risk: UK companies with maturing debt face significantly higher rates. The UK government’s planned gilt sales are already double 2016 levels.

The Opportunities for Lateral Thinkers

  • Rethinking Hedging: If bonds and equities now move together, what new hedges can you create? Tokenisation, digital settlement, and AI-driven risk analytics offer new tools.
  • Supply Chain Reinvention: Instead of assuming disruption is temporary, build redundancy, nearshoring, and alternative energy sources into your business model.
  • Strategic Refinancing: Lock in current rates before they rise further, but also explore alternative financing structures—green bonds, infrastructure bonds, or private credit.
  • Embracing Experimentation: As BlackRock notes, “outcomes depend less on broad exposure and more on selectivity, risk budgeting”. This means trying new approaches—and accepting that some will fail.

—

Who Should Be Interested in Rethinking Risk?

Any UK business leader who wants to thrive rather than just survive should be interested in rethinking risk, because the old certainties are gone and the businesses that question everything will lead the next cycle.

  • CFOs and Treasurers: Your traditional hedging strategies may no longer work. Time to experiment.
  • CEOs and Business Owners: Your growth plans depend on capital costs that are rising for structural reasons, not cyclical ones.
  • Risk Managers: The biggest risk is assuming you understand the risks. Challenge your own assumptions.
  • Supply Chain Directors: Energy costs and geopolitical disruption are here to stay. Build resilience through redundancy, not efficiency.
  • Innovation Officers: The businesses that experiment—and accept some failures—will find new paths to growth.

—

When Will This Impact My Business—and Where?

The impact is already being felt, but the full effects will materialise over the next 6 to 18 months as the gap between conventional policy and structural reality becomes impossible to ignore.

Timeline of Impact

  • Immediate (Now – October 2026): Volatility in financial markets; rising short-term borrowing costs; the UK government’s first budget on October 28 will set the fiscal trajectory.
  • Short-Term (October 2026 – March 2027): Markets are pricing rate hikes by major central banks. The question is whether these hikes will work—or make things worse.
  • Medium-Term (2027-2028): If central banks persist with demand-killing policies into a supply shock, stagflation becomes a real risk. Pimco is already warning that the “credit loss cycle is upon us”.

Where the Impact Will Be Felt

  • UK Domestic Economy: Most directly, through higher borrowing costs and reduced consumer spending power.
  • Global Supply Chains: Companies with international suppliers face higher financing costs and potential currency volatility.
  • Capital Markets: Access to debt and equity financing will become more expensive and selective.
  • Energy-Intensive Industries: Manufacturing, logistics, and retail will feel the pinch most acutely.

This article was incorporated into BusinessRiskTV Enterprise Risk Management Magazine as part of our commitment to helping UK business leaders think differently about risk. For more insights, analysis, and practical guidance, join the BusinessRiskTV Business Risk Management Club today.

Final thoughts and takeaways

“Central banks are about to raise rates into a supply shock. That’s like setting fire to your house to warm it up.”

The one thing every business leader needs to hear today—and it’s not what you think.

In September 2026, UK 10-year gilt yields hit 5.29% —the highest since 2007. 30-year yields? 5.92% , a level not seen since 1998.

The immediate cause? War in the Middle East driving Brent crude past $95 a barrel. The response? Central banks preparing to raise rates (in some cases raising rates even further during energy supply crisis!).

Here’s the problem no one wants to admit:

This isn’t a demand-driven inflation problem. It’s a supply shock. And raising rates doesn’t produce more oil, fix broken supply chains, or end wars. It just makes borrowing more expensive for businesses already drowning in higher energy bills.

Yet the Bank of England’s Chief Economist, Huw Pill, still argues for a hike to 4%. He admits UK vulnerability “stems from the deterioration of the supply side… over the past 20 years”—then proposes a demand-side solution!

85% of UK business leaders we surveyed say they’re stress-testing against higher rates. Only 9% are stress-testing against stagflation—the real risk when you hike rates into a supply shock.

Three unconventional moves for UK business leaders today:

  1. Abandon the old playbook. What worked in the 2010s won’t work in the 2020s. Deglobalisation, protectionism, and structural inflation are here to stay.
  2. Stress-test against stagflation, not just higher rates. Model what happens if inflation stays at 4-5% while growth slows to 1% or even contracts.
  3. Embrace experimentation with like-minded independent thinkers — and accept that some mistakes are necessary. The businesses that try new things and learn from failures will outperform those that stick rigidly to broken models.

If your business may struggle to survive or prosper in increasingly difficult business environment maybe you need some help to better inform your business decision-making?

The biggest risk isn’t what we don’t know. It’s what we think we know for sure.

Join BusinessRiskTV Business Risk Management Club for real-time risk intelligence that challenges conventional narratives. Because in a world where the old rules are failing, you need more than information—you need a community of lateral thinkers. Pick your group to think with instead of traditional GroupThink.

Link👇
BusinessRiskTV.com

Contact Us To Subscribe BusinessRiskTV – Reach Global Decision Makers

#BondMarketMistake #SupplyShockTruth #BusinessRiskTV #RiskManagement #EnterpriseRiskManagement

What You Need To Know About Coming soon:

  • Private Credit and Private Equity Crisis
  • Food Security – Or Rather Food Insecurity Crisis
  • Commercial Property Crisis and Single Family Home Property Price Crash Crisis
  • Ukraine War Russia and Europe
  • Regional War in Middle East and Global Economic Crisis
  • Water Shortages Data Centres and Rising Costs of Water Supply
  • Gold Silver Raw Earth Minerals Crisis and Opportunities
  • Cryptocurrency Tokenisation of All Assets Opportunities and Fiat Currency Obsolescence

#BondMarketMistake #SupplyShockTruth #BusinessRiskTV #RiskManagement #EntrrpriseRiskManagement

Get help to protect and grow your business faster with less uncertainty with BusinessRiskTV

Find out more about growing your business faster with BusinessRiskTV 

Subscribe for free business risk management ideas risk reviews and cost of doing business reduction tips

Connect with BusinessRiskTV for free business risk management tips

Read more business risk management articles and view videos for free

Connect with BusinessRiskTV for free alerts to new business risk management articles and videos

UK Bond Market Crisis September 2026: Why Raising Rates Into a Supply Shock Is a Mistake