Rare Earth Minerals: The Critical Chokepoint Fuelling the US-China Trade War
The global supply chain for Rare Earth Elements (REEs) is a major point of economic and geopolitical vulnerability, now intensifying the trade war between the US and China. These 17 elements are not actually rare in the Earth’s crust, but finding them in economically viable, concentrated deposits is unusual, and the processing expertise is highly consolidated. The world’s dependency on a single source for these materials—vital for high-tech industries and national security—has made them a powerful geopolitical leverage tool.
China’s Dominance: The Supply Chain Chokepoint
Rare earth minerals are indispensable in modern technology. They form the basis of powerful permanent magnets used in Electric Vehicles (EVs), wind turbines, smartphones, advanced military equipment (like missiles and fighter jets), and numerous other high-tech consumer electronics.
Predominant Sources and Control
The problem isn’t the physical mining of the minerals, but the complex and often environmentally taxing separation and processing into usable elements and magnets.
Stage of Supply Chain China’s Estimated Global Control
China Mining ∼70%
China Separation & Processing ∼90%
China Magnet Manufacturing ∼93%
China has held indisputable dominance over the rare earth supply chain since the 1990s, making it the primary global source of refined REEs. The US, which was once the leading global producer, now imports a significant portion of its rare earth oxides, much of it directly or indirectly sourced from China. This dominance provides Beijing with a potent economic leverage tool.
Rare Earths as a Weapon in the Trade War
The US-China trade war, initially focused on tariffs and intellectual property, has now fundamentally shifted to control over critical raw materials.
Geopolitical Leverage
China has weaponised its dominance by implementing export controls on rare earths and related processing technology. These actions directly target the US industrial and defense base, which relies on these materials.
Export Restrictions: China has expanded restrictions to include magnets containing even trace amounts of Chinese-sourced REEs, or products manufactured using Chinese refining technology. These new controls effectively grant China veto power over key global supply chains, including advanced semiconductors and EVs.
National Security Focus: Beijing justifies the moves by citing the need to “protect its national security and interests” and prevent the “misuse of rare earth materials in military and other sensitive sectors.” These controls force foreign companies, including those in India’s auto industry, to provide end-use certifications to ensure the materials aren’t re-exported to the US for military applications.
US Response: The US has retaliated with threats of steep tariffs on Chinese goods and is aggressively pursuing domestic production and ‘friend-shoring’ initiatives with allies like Australia, Canada, and Vietnam to diversify its supply chain away from China. This intense back-and-forth confirms that rare earths are not just a trade issue but a core strategic and national security concern.
6 Business Risk Management Tips for Supply Chain Resilience
Businesses reliant on products that use rare earths (like EV manufacturers, electronics firms, and defense contractors) must take proactive steps to mitigate this escalating supply chain crisis.
- Supply Diversification: Actively seek and activate alternative sources of REE ores, refining capacity, and finished components from politically stable regions (e.g., Australia, US domestic production, or other allied nations).
- Multi-Tier Risk Assessment: Go beyond direct suppliers (Tier 1) to map and assess risks across all tiers of your supply chain (Tiers 2 and 3) to identify where reliance on China’s REE processing truly lies.
- Strategic Stockpiling: Maintain a buffer stock of critical rare earth materials or high-value components to hedge against short-term disruptions, price spikes, and abrupt export license changes.
- Invest in Recycling/Circular Economy: Prioritise R&D and investment in RE-free substitutes and urban mining (recycling of rare earths from end-of-life products like batteries and magnets) to create a sustainable, non-China-dependent source.
- Conduct Scenario Planning: Run ‘what-if’ exercises based on geopolitical events (e.g., complete Chinese export ban, 100% US tariffs) to understand potential financial and operational implications and prepare rapid response plans.
- Continuous Monitoring & Traceability: Implement a robust supply chain risk management system to continuously monitor geopolitical, regulatory, and financial risks for all key suppliers and raw material sources.
Get help to protect and grow your business faster with BusinessRiskTV
Find out more about growing your business with BusinessRiskTV
Subscribe for free business risk management news reviews and cost reduction ideas
Connect with us for free business risk management tips
Read more business risk management articles and view videos for free
Connect with us for free alerts to new business risk management articles and views
Rare Earth Supply Crisis: How US-China Trade War Threatens Global Tech Supply Chains
Rare Earth Supply Chain Risk: Mitigating China’s Export Curbs & Building Resilience
Business Risk Management Analysis: Critical Mineral Supply Chain Vulnerabilities
A recent analysis by Goldman Sachs underscores a significant and escalating business risk: the profound vulnerability of global supply chains for rare earth elements (REEs) and other critical minerals. With China dominating mining (69%), refining (92%), and magnet manufacturing (98%), the recent expansion of Chinese export curbs is a stark reminder of the geopolitical leverage at play. For businesses in sectors from high-tech and automotive to aerospace and defence, this concentration represents a critical threat to operational continuity and financial stability.
The risks are disproportionate to the market size. While the rare earth market is valued at a fraction of bulk commodities like copper, a disruption of just 10% to industries reliant on REEs could trigger an estimated $150 billion in lost economic output, alongside significant inflationary pressures. Elements like samarium (critical for aerospace magnets), lutetium, and terbium are flagged as particularly vulnerable to immediate curbs.
Primary Risk Exposure for Businesses:
· Supply Disruption Risk: Heavy reliance on a single geographic source for raw materials, refined products, and key components like magnets.
· Cost Inflation Risk: Export controls, tariffs, and supply squeezes will lead to volatile and soaring input costs.
· Operational Halts: A severe shortage could halt production lines for products dependent on these specialised minerals.
· Strategic Inflexibility: Dependence limits a company’s ability to navigate geopolitical tensions and make long-term, stable plans.
Nations and companies are scrambling to build independent supply chains, but Goldman Sachs highlights formidable barriers, including the 8-10 years required to develop new mines and the advanced expertise needed for refining. This means the current risk environment is not a short-term blip but a persistent structural challenge.
—
Six Business Risk Management Tips to Mitigate Threats
To navigate this precarious landscape, businesses must adopt a proactive and multi-faceted risk management strategy. Here are six essential tips to build resilience:
1. Aggressively Diversify the Supplier Base
Move beyond a China-centric supply model. Actively seek and qualify suppliers from other regions. This includes forging partnerships with Western producers like Lynas Rare Earths, MP Materials, and Iluka Resources, who are key to building independent supply chains. Diversification should be pursued for both raw minerals and refined components.
2. Implement Strategic Stockpiling and Inventory Buffers
For the most critical and high-risk elements identified in your products (e.g., samarium, terbium), maintain a strategic inventory reserve. This safety stock acts as a crucial buffer, absorbing short-term supply shocks and providing valuable time to activate contingency plans during a disruption.
3. Invest in a Circular Economy through Recycling and Reclamation
Reduce primary supply dependence by creating closed-loop systems. Invest in R&D and partnerships to reclaim rare earths from end-of-life products, manufacturing scrap, and electronic waste. This not only secures an alternative supply source but also strongly aligns with corporate sustainability and ESG goals.
4. Accelerate R&D for Material Substitution and Efficiency
Fund research and development efforts focused on “designing out” the most vulnerable materials. This includes developing alternative materials that use more abundant elements, redesigning products to use less critical mineral content, and employing AI to optimize material usage in manufacturing processes.
5. Enhance End-to-End Supply Chain Visibility and Mapping
You cannot manage a risk you cannot see. Utilise supply chain mapping technologies to gain full visibility into your sub-tier suppliers, all the way back to the source mine. This allows for proactive identification of hidden dependencies and vulnerabilities, enabling you to assess risks before they cause a disruption.
6. Forge Collaborative Supplier Partnerships and Conduct Scenario Planning
Shift from transactional relationships to strategic, collaborative partnerships with key suppliers. Engage in joint scenario planning exercises to model responses to various disruption events—from export bans to logistical logjams. This ensures a faster, more coordinated, and more effective response when a crisis occurs.
In conclusion, the concentration of rare earth and critical mineral supply chains is a fundamental business vulnerability. The most resilient organisations will be those that treat this not as a mere procurement issue, but as a core strategic imperative, addressing it through a determined combination of diversification, innovation, and collaboration.
#SupplyChainRisk #RareEarths #CriticalMinerals #GeopoliticalRisk #RiskManagement #ESG
China’s Rare Earth Dominance Threatens US Economy
America’s Critical Mineral Dilemma: Why China’s Rare Earth Dominance Won’t Fade Quickly
In the high-stakes arena of global economic competition, rare earth elements (REEs) have emerged as a pivotal strategic resource, with China wielding unprecedented control over their supply chain. Recent export restrictions imposed by Beijing on seven critical rare earth elements have exposed a fundamental vulnerability in American economic and national security. Despite political rhetoric and emergency measures, this dependency represents a deep-rooted structural problem that cannot be resolved in days, weeks, or even months. This article examines the complex factors underpinning China’s dominance, the specific U.S. industries at risk, and why this geopolitical imbalance favors Beijing for the foreseeable future.
The Strategic Importance of Rare Earth Elements
Despite their name, rare earth elements are relatively abundant in the Earth’s crust but rarely occur in concentrated, economically viable deposits. These seventeen metallic elements, including scandium, yttrium, and the fifteen lanthanides, possess unique magnetic, luminescent, and electrochemical properties that make them indispensable across modern technological applications . What distinguishes these elements is their irreplaceable nature in specific high-tech contexts—even minimal quantities can dramatically enhance performance characteristics in ways no substitute materials can replicate.
The seven elements recently restricted by China—including yttrium, dysprosium, and terbium—have become the focal point of global supply chain concerns due to their critical roles in defense and technology sectors . These medium and heavy rare earth elements are particularly strategic because of their application in high-performance magnets that maintain their magnetic strength at extreme temperatures, a property essential for everything from precision-guided weapons to electric vehicle motors.
Table: Key Restricted Rare Earth Elements and Their Applications
Element Primary Applications
Samarium Samarium-cobalt magnet alloys
Gadolinium Gd-Mg alloys, nuclear applications, medical imaging
Terbium Magnet additive for high-temperature stability
Dysprosium Critical for NdFeB magnets in EV motors and defense systems
Lutetium Petroleum refining, radiation detectors
Scandium High-strength aluminum alloys (aerospace)
Yttrium Lasers, radar, EV battery phosphors
China’s Calculated Rise to Dominance
China’s current commanding position in the global rare earth market—controlling approximately 70% of global production and an astonishing 85-90% of refining capacity—represents the culmination of decades of strategic planning and investment . Beginning in the 1980s, Chinese leadership identified these elements as “strategic resources” and implemented a coordinated long-term strategy combining state-backed investments in mining infrastructure with the systematic acquisition of foreign processing technology . This methodical approach enabled China to develop an unparalleled ecosystem spanning the entire value chain, from raw material extraction to advanced manufacturing applications.
China’s dominance stems not merely from natural deposits but from deliberate policy choices. Through tax incentives for export-oriented production, consolidation of the industry under state-owned enterprises, and significant investment in research and development, China created a vertically integrated rare earth industry that competitors couldn’t match on cost . While Western nations divested from rare earth processing due to environmental concerns and cost pressures, China recognized the strategic value and patiently built capabilities, developing technical expertise through approximately 40 universities specializing in extractive metallurgy and another 40 in mineral processing . This educational infrastructure contrasts sharply with the United States, where zero universities maintain such specialized programs and fewer than 700 students are enrolled in mining-related fields .
America’s Vulnerable Industries
Defense and National Security
The U.S. defense sector faces immediate vulnerabilities from rare earth supply disruptions. Nearly 78% of U.S. defense platforms rely on Chinese-processed rare earth elements for critical components . Each F-35 fighter jet requires approximately 920 pounds of rare earth materials for radar systems, targeting mechanisms, and engines, while Navy destroyers and submarines depend on these elements for sonar, communications, and power systems . With China controlling approximately 99% of global heavy rare earth refining , a sustained supply disruption could impair production timelines for vital defense assets including hypersonic missiles, satellite systems, and other advanced weapons platforms essential for maintaining technological superiority.
Automotive and Clean Energy
The automotive industry’s pivot toward electrification has dramatically increased its dependence on rare earth elements, particularly through neodymium-iron-boron magnets alloyed with dysprosium and terbium . These materials are fundamental to electric vehicle motors, power steering systems, and braking components. Industry reports indicate that Tesla already reduced Q2 2025 electric vehicle production by approximately 15% due to magnet shortages following China’s export restrictions . Similarly, the clean energy sector requires massive quantities of rare earths—a single 3 MW wind turbine uses approximately 600 kg of rare earth elements per megawatt of generating capacity . Supply constraints threaten to delay renewable energy projects by 12-18 months, significantly hampering climate goals and transition timelines.
Technology and Consumer Electronics
The consumer electronics industry faces cascading disruptions from rare earth shortages. Smartphones contain up to 0.35 grams of yttrium and terbium for displays and vibration modules, while computers, flat-screen TVs, and hard drives all require these elements for critical components . The manufacturing of specialty glass, phosphors used in displays, and polishing compounds all depend on specific rare earth elements whose unique atomic properties cannot be replicated by substitutes without significant performance compromises . Industry analysts warn that a six-month supply disruption would increase smartphone prices by 15-25% and cause significant delays in product availability .
China’s Geopolitical Leverage
China’s dominance in rare earth elements provides what one analyst described as a “double-edged sword”—offering pathways for partnership while simultaneously escalating global tensions . This strategic positioning allows Beijing to employ rare earth resources as effective geopolitical tools during diplomatic disputes, a pattern demonstrated historically and in current trade tensions.
Historical Precedents and Current Actions
China has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to weaponize rare earth supplies during geopolitical tensions. In 2010, Beijing imposed a temporary embargo on rare earth exports to Japan during a territorial dispute over the Diaoyu Islands, a move that catalyzed global efforts to diversify supply chains . More recently, in April 2025, China’s Ministry of Commerce implemented comprehensive licensing requirements for seven critical rare earth elements through an electronic control system that adds bureaucratic complexity and uncertainty to the export process . This approach represents a sophisticated understanding of supply chain vulnerabilities—by restricting elements critical to high-technology applications rather than imposing broad trade barriers, China can calibrate economic pressure while maintaining plausible deniability regarding broader trade retaliation .
The Power of Delay and Uncertainty
Unlike outright bans, China’s licensing framework requires extensive documentation, including end-user certificates, environmental compliance reports, and detailed technical application information . This system intentionally lacks transparency regarding processing timelines, approval criteria, or appeal mechanisms. Industry sources report minimum 60-day backlogs for license approvals, with actual wait times potentially extending much longer . One customs broker explained, “There’s no clarity on prioritization criteria—it’s essentially a black box with unpredictable outcomes” . This administrative uncertainty compounds market disruption beyond direct supply impacts, creating a powerful deterrent against challenging Chinese positions in international disputes.
Why This Won’t Be Quickly Resolved
The Decade-Long Timeline for Supply Chain Development
Establishing an independent rare earth supply chain represents a monumental undertaking that cannot be achieved rapidly. Industry experts estimate that building complete Western supply chain resilience will require $10-15 billion in mining, processing, and manufacturing infrastructure and extend through 2035 . The U.S. timeline for domestic capacity development reveals the staggering scale of this challenge:
· Near-term (2025–2027): Initial production from projects like the Round Top deposit in Texas, projected to meet just 20% of U.S. demand .
· Medium-term (2028–2030): Three new processing facilities operational, potentially meeting 40% of demand .
· Long-term (2031–2035): Full supply chain resilience projected, with recycling potentially providing 25% of needs .
Structural and Regulatory Hurdles
The United States faces structural impediments that will delay solutions for years. The environmental permitting process alone represents a significant bottleneck—the average time to permit new mines in the U.S. is approximately 29 years according to regulatory analyses . Additionally, the specialized expertise required for rare earth processing has largely migrated to China over decades, creating a human capital deficit that cannot be rapidly addressed. With nearly 40 Chinese universities specializing in extractive metallurgy and another 40 in mineral processing, compared to zero comparable programs in the United States, the knowledge gap represents a structural disadvantage that will take generations to overcome .
Economic Disincentives and Market Realities
The economics of rare earth production create natural barriers to market entry that favor incumbent Chinese producers. While rare earths are essential components, they are typically used in small quantities, resulting in a relatively small global market valued at approximately $170 million in U.S. imports last year . This limited market size, combined with China’s ability to flood the market and suppress prices when competitors emerge, creates significant disincentives for private investment in Western rare earth projects. The inherent market volatility of these commodities further discourages potential investors, maintaining the status of Chinese dominance despite geopolitical tensions.
Conclusion: A Strategic Challenge Requiring Sustained Commitment
China’s dominance in rare earth elements represents a fundamental vulnerability in America’s economic and national security framework—a dependency decades in the making that cannot be unraveled in the short term. The recent export restrictions have exposed the precarious position of critical U.S. industries, from defense systems that ensure national security to clean energy technologies that promise a sustainable future. In this high-stakes geopolitical poker game, China undeniably holds most of the cards, with its comprehensive control spanning mining, processing, manufacturing, and associated intellectual property.
Addressing this challenge requires acknowledging the long-term nature of the solution—a coordinated, strategically patient approach combining public and private investment, international partnerships with allied nations, environmental innovation, and educational development. Success hinges on sustained policy support spanning multiple administrations and potentially decades of development. As the world navigates the transition to advanced technologies and renewable energy, the nation that controls these critical materials will continue to wield substantial influence over the global economic and geopolitical landscape for the foreseeable future.
#RareEarths #ChinaDominance #TechColdWar
Join business risk management club here